Dismembered percutaneous endopyeloplasty: A new procedure

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 210-217

  Sharp, David S ^a   Desai, Mihir M ^a   Molina, Wilson R ^a   Spaliviero, Massimiliano ^a   Abreu, Sidney C ^a   Ramani, Anup P ^a   Kaouk, Jihad H ^a   Gill, Inderbir S ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ACCURACY; AERATION; ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL EUTHANASIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BLEEDING; CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISMEMBERED PERCUTANEOUS ENDOPYELOPLASTY; DISSECTION; EDEMA; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; EXTRAVASATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY; KIDNEY PELVIS; MICTURITION; MOBILIZATION; MORBIDITY; MUCOSA; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOGRAPHY; PYELOPLASTY; RETROPERITONEUM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; URETER; URETER CATHETER; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; CARBON DIOXIDE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INSUFFLATION; KIDNEY PELVIS; MODELS, ANIMAL; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SWINE; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 14644429114     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.210     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, et al. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995;46:791.
2. Bauer JJ, Bischof JT, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692.
3. Karlin GS, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Endopyelotomy versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison in 88 patients. J Urol 1988;140:476.
4. Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: An 8 year followup. J Urol 1993;149:453.
5. Gerber GS, Kim JC. Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2000;55:198.
6. Clayman RV, Basler JW, Kavoussi L, et al. Ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy. J Urol 1990;144:246.
7. Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, et al. Acucise endopyelotomy: Assessment of long-term durability. J Urol;156:1094.
8. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Indications, technique, and long-term outcome. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:323.
9. Ben Slama MR, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Initial experience in 15 cases. Urology 2000;56:45.
10. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, et al. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 1996;47:311.
11. Van Cangh PJ. Endopyelotomy: A panacea for ureteropelvic junction obstruction? [editorial]. J Urol 1998;159:66.
12. Jarret TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253.
13. Desai MM, Gill IS, Carvalhal EF, et al. Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: A novel technique. J Endourol 2002;16:431.
14. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, et al. Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: Description of a new technique. J Urol 2002;168:2097.
15. Wentzell PG, Arnold AJ, Rickwood AMK. Two-needle modification of the Whitaker test. Br J Urol 1988;62:388.