History lessons - Sanctions: Neither war nor peace

Journal of Economic Perspectives

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 187-197

  Davis, Lance ^a,c   Engerman, Stanley ^b,c  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042772990     PISSN: 08953309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1257/089533003765888502     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Borchard, Edwin M. 1937. "Sanction, International," in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume 13. Edwin R. A. Seligman, ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 528-31.
2. Brownlie, Ian. 1963. International Law and the Use of Force By States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Congressional Budget Office. 1999. The Domestic Costs of Sanctions on Foreign Commerce. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office.
4. Daoudi, M. S. and M. S. Dajani. 1983. Economic Sanctions: Ideals and Experience. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5. Davis, George B. 1901. TheElements of International Law: With an Account of its Origin, Sources, and Historical Development. New York: Harper & Brothers.
6. Davis, Lance and Stanley Engerman. 2001. "International Law and Naval Blockades During World War I: Britain. Germany, and the United States, Traditional Strategies Versus the Submarine." Unpublished working paper, California Institute of Technology.
7. Doxey, Margaret P. 1997. International Sanctions in Contemporary Perspective. Second Edition. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
8. Drezner, Daniel W. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
9. Eaton, Jonathan and Maxim Engers. 1999. "Sanctions: Some Simple Analytics." American Economic Review. May, 89, pp. 409-14.
10. Elagab, Omer Yousif. 1988. The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Elliott, Kimberly Ann. 1998. "The Sanctions Glass: Half Full or Completely Empty?" International Security. Summer, 23, pp. 50-65.
12. Elliott, Kimberley Ann and Gary Clyde Hufbauer. 1999. "Same Song, Same Refrain?: Economic Sanctions in the 1990s." American Economic Review. May, 89, pp. 403-08.
13. Hogan, Albert E. 1908. Pacific Blockade. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott and Kimberley Ann Elliott. 1990. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
15. Lash, William H. III. 1999. "An Overview of the Economic Costs of Unilateral Trade Sanctions," in Economic Casualties: How U.S. Foreign Policy Undermines Trade, Growth, and Liberty. Solveig Singleton and Daniel T. Griswold, eds. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, pp. 13-17.
16. Macalister-Smith, Peter, ed. 1992. Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume I. Amsterdam: North Holland.
17. Pape, Robert A. 1997. "Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work." International Security. Fall, 22, pp. 90-136.
18. Pape, Robert A. 1998. "Why Economic Sanctions Still Do Not Work." International Security. Summer, 23, pp. 66-77.
19. Uchitelle, Louis. 1996. "Who's Punishing Whom? The Trade Ban is a Boomerang, U.S. Companies Say." New York Times. September 11, pp. D1 and D4.
20. Whiteman, Marjorie M. 1971. Digest of International Law, Volume 12. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
21. Williams, David. 1999. "Review of Donald W. Drezner, The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations." Times Literary Supplement. October 29, p. 33.
22. Ziring, Lawrence, Jack C. Plano and Roy Olton. 1995. International Relations: A Political Dictionary. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.