Postural stability during treadmill locomotion as a function of the visual polarity and rotation of a three-dimensional virtual environment

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 371-384

  Richards, Jason T ^a   Mulavara, Ajitkumar P ^b   Bloomberg, Jacob J ^c  

^a WYLE LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POSTURAL STABILITY; TORSO ROLL; TREADMILL LOCOMOTION; VISUAL POLARITY;

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAVITATION; POLARIZATION; SENSORS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 3042764408     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/1054746041422299     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allison, R., Howard, L, & Zacher, J. (1999). Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room. Perception, 28(3), 299-306.
2. Annesi, J., & Mazas, J. (1997). Effects of virtual reality-enhanced exercise equipment on adherence and exercise induced feeling states. Percept Motor Skills, 85(3 Pt 1), 835-844.
3. Asch, S., & Witkin, H. (1992). Studies in space orientation, II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. J Exp Psychol Gen, 121(4), 407-418.
4. Bardy, B., Warren, W., & Kay, B. (1996). Motion parallax is used to control postural sway during walking. Exp Brain Res, 111(2), 271-282.
5. _. (1999). The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control during walking. Percept Psycbophys, 61(7), 1356-1368.
6. Beusmans, J. (1993). Computing the direction of heading from affine image flow. Biol Cybern, 70(2), 123-136.
7. Bloomberg, J., Peters, B., Smith, S., Huebner, W., & Reschke, M. (1997). Locomotor head-trunk coordination strategies following spaceflight. J Vestib Res, 7(2-3), 161-177.
8. Chao, E. (1980). Justification of triaxial goniometer for the measurement of joint rotation. J Biomech, 13(12), 989-1006.
9. Duh, H., Lin, J., Kenyon, R., Parker, D., & Furncss, T. (2002). Effects of characteristics of image quality in an immersive environment. Presence: Teleoperators und Virtual Environments, 11(3), 324-332.
10. Ferman, L., Collewijn, H., Jansen, T., & Van den Berg, A. (1987). Human gaze stability in the horizontal, vertical and torsional direction during voluntary head movements, evaluated with a three-dimensional scleral induction coil technique. Vision Res, 27(5), 811-828.
11. Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Miffiin.
12. Glasauer, S., Amorim, M., Bloomberg, J., Reschke, M., Peters, B., Smith, S., et al. (1995). Spatial orientation during locomotion following space flight. Acta Astronaut, 36(812), 423-431.
13. Held, R., Dichigans, J., & Bauer, J. (1975). Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation. Vision Res, 15(3), 357-365.
14. Howard, I., Cheung, B., & Landolt, J. (1988). Influence of vection axis and body posture on visually induced self rotation. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 433, 1-15.
15. Howard, I., & Childerson, L. (1994). The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt. Perception, 23(7), 753-762.
16. Jahn, K, Strupp, M., Schneider, E., Dieterich, M., & Brandt, T. (2001). Visually induced gait deviations during different locomotion speeds. Exp Brain Res, 141(3), 370-374.
17. Keshner, E., & Kenyon, K. (2000). The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. J Vestib Res, 10(4-5), 207219.
18. Keshner, E., Woollacott, M., & Debu, B. (1988). Neck, trunk, and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res, 71(3), 455-466.
19. Lappe, M., & Rauschecker, J. (1993). A neural network for the processing of optic flow from ego-motion in higher mammals. Neural Comput, 5, 374-391.
20. Layne, C., Mulavara, A., McDonald, P., Pruett, C., Kozlovskaya, I., & Bloomberg, J. (2001). The effect of long duration spaccflight on postural control during self-generated perturbations. J Appl Physiol, 90(3), 997-1006.
21. Layne, C., Lange, G., Pruett, C., McDonald, P., Merkle, L., Mulavara, A., et al. (1998). Adaptation of neuromuscular activation patterns during treadmill walking after long-duration space flight. Acta Astronaut, 43(3-6), 107-119.
22. Mast, F., Berthoz, A, & Kosslyn, S. (2001). Mental imagery of visual motion modifies the perception of roll-vection stimulation. Perception, 30(8), 945-957.
23. Mast, F., Kosslyn, S., & Berthoz, A (1999). Visual mental imagery interferes with allocentric orientation judgements. Neuroreport, 10(17), 3549-3553.
24. McDonald, P., Basdogan, C., Bloomberg, J., & Layne, C. (1996). Lower limb kinematics during treadmill walking after space flight: Implications for gaze stabilization. Exp Brain Res, 112(2), 325-334.
25. Miller, C., Mulavara, A, & Bloomberg, J. (2002). A quasistatic method for determining the characteristics of a motion capture camera system in a "split-volume" configuration. Gait and Posture, 16(3), 283-287.
26. Mulavara, A., Verstraete, M., & Bloomberg, J. (2002). Modulation of head movement control in humans during treadmill walking. Gait and Posture, 16(3), 271-282.
27. Myers, R., & Laenger, C. (1998). Virtual reality in rehabilitation. Disability Rehab, 20(3), 111-112.
28. Newman, D., Jackson, D., & Bloomberg, J. (1997). Altered astronaut lower limb and mass center kinematics in downward jumping following space flight. Exp Brain Res, 117(1), 30-42.
29. Oman, C., Howard, I., Smith, T., Beall, A, Natapoff, A., Zacher, J., et al. (2003). The role of visual cues in micro-gravity spatial orientation. In J. Buckey & J. Homick (Eds.), The Neurolab Spacelab mission: Neuroscience research in space (pp. 69-82). Houston, TX: NASA.
30. Oman, C., Lichtenberg, B., Money, K., & McCoy, R. (1986). M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1mission: 4. Space motion sickness: symptoms, stimuli, and predictability. Exp Brain Res, 64(2), 316-334.
31. Previc, F. (1992). The effects of dynamic visual stimulation on perception and motor control. J Vestib Res, 2(4), 285-295.
32. Prokop, T., Schubert, M., & Berger, W. (1997). Visual influence on human locomotion: Modulation to changes in optic flow. Exp Brain Res, 114(1), 63-70.
33. Querner, V., Krafczyk, S., Dieterich, M., & Brandt, T. (2002). Phobic postural vertigo: Body sway during visually induced roll vection. Exp Brain Res, 143(3), 269-275.
34. Rieser, J., Pick, H., Jr., Ashmead, D., & Garing, A. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. J of Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform, 21(3), 480-497.
35. Rose, F., Attree, E., & Johnson, D. (1996). Virtual reality: An assistive technology in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neural, 9(6), 461-467.
36. Vaina, L., & Rushton, S. (2000). What neurological patients tell us about the use of optic flow. Int Rev Neurobiol, 44, 293-313.
37. Warren, W., Kay, B., & Yilmaz, E. (1996). Visual control of posture during walking: Functional specificity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 22(4), 818-838.
38. Warren, W., Kay, B., Zosh, W., Duchon, A., & Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Neuroscience, 4(2), 213-216.
39. Watt, D., Landolt, J., & Young, L. (1993). Effects of longterm weightlessness on roll circularvection. Can Aeronaut Space J, 39(1), 52-55.
40. Wilson, P., Foreman, N., & Stanton, D. (1997). Virtual reality, disability and rehabilitation. Disability Rehab, 19(6), 213-220.
41. Young, L., & Shelhamer, M. (1990). Microgravity enhances the relative contribution of visually-induced motion sensation. Aviat Space Environ Med, 61(6), 525-530.
42. Young, L., Shelhamer, M., & Modestino, S. (1986). M.I.T./ Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: Visual vestibular tilt interaction in weightlessness. Exp Brain Res, 64(2), 299-307.