The purpose of lexical/sublexical interaction during spelling: Further evidence from dysgraphia and articulatory suppression

Neurocase

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-69

  Folk, Jocelyn R ^a   Jones, Angela C ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSGRAPHIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGRAPHIA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HEAD INJURIES, CLOSED; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LANGUAGE; READING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; WRITING;

EID: 3042732669     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13554790490960512     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barry C, Seymour PHK. Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1988; 40: 5-40.
2. Beauvois MF, Derouesne J. Lexical or orthographic agraphia. Brain 1981; 104: 21-49.
3. Campbell R. Writing nonwords to dictation. Brain and Language 1983; 19: 153-78.
4. Cuetos F. Writing processes in shallow orthography. Reading and Writing 1993; 5: 17-28.
5. Ellis AW. Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In: Ellis AW, editor. Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. London: Academic Press, 1982.
6. Folk JR, Rapp B, Goldrick M. The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What's the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology 2002; 19: 653-71.
7. Goodman RA, Caramazza A. The Johns Hopkins university dysgraphia battery. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1985a.
8. Goodman RA, Caramazza A. The Johns Hopkins university dyslexia battery. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1985b.
9. Goodman RA, Caramazza A. Aspects of the spelling process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Language and Cognitive Processes 1986; 1: 263-96.
10. Hanna PR, Hanna JS, Hodges RR, Rudorf EH, Jr. Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1966.
11. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit. Brain and Language 1991; 40: 106-44.
12. Hillis A, Rapp B, Caramazza A. When a rose is a rose in speech but a tulip in writing. Cortex 1999; 35: 337-56.
13. Houghton G, Zorzi M. A model of the sound-spelling mapping in English and its role in word and nonword spelling. In: Gernsbacher MA, editor. Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1998; 490-501.
14. Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
15. Kucera H, Francis WN. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1967.
16. Paap KR, Noel RW. Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horses race. Psychological Research 1991; 53: 13-24.
17. Patterson KE. Lexical but nonsemantic spelling? Cognitive Neuropsychology 1986; 3: 341-67.
18. Patterson KE. Acquired disorders of spelling. In: Denes G, Semenza C, Bisiacchi P, editors. Perspectives on cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988; 213-29.
19. Rapp B, Epstein C, Tainturier MJ. The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2002; 19: 1-29.
20. Shallice T. Phonological agraphia and the lexical route in writing. Brain 1981; 104: 413-29.
21. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology [Human Learn] 1980; 6: 413-29.
22. Tainturier MJ, Rapp B. The spelling process. In: Rapp B, editor. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 2002; 263-89.