Letter to the editor: NMR structure of the apo-S100P protein [4]

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 399-402

  Lee, Yi Chien ^a   Volk, David E ^a   Thiviyanathan, Varatharasa ^a   Kleerekoper, Quinn ^a,c   Gribenko, Alexey V ^b   Zhang, Shanmin ^a   Gorenstein, David G ^a   Makhatadze, George I ^b   Luxon, Bruce A ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Apo S100P; Homodimer; NMR structure

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN S 100; CALCIUM; CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; COMPLEMENTARY DNA; NERVE GROWTH FACTOR; S 100 CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN BETA SUBUNIT; S-100 CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEIN BETA SUBUNIT; S100P PROTEIN, HUMAN; TUMOR MARKER; TUMOR PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOMAGRESBANK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; LETTER; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR CLONING; NEOPLASM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TEMPERATURE;

CALCIUM; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CLONING, MOLECULAR; DIMERIZATION; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; NEOPLASMS; NERVE GROWTH FACTORS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; S100 PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TEMPERATURE; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 3042721492     PISSN: 09252738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000032617.88899.4b     Document Type: Letter

References (20)

1. Averboukh, L. et al. (1996) Prostate, 29, 350-354.
2. Case, D.A. et al. (1999) AMBER6, University of California.
3. Cornilescu, G. et al. (1999) J. Biomol. NMR, 4, 289-302.
4. Donato, R. (2001) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 33, 637-668.
5. Drohat, A.C. et al. (1999) Protein Sci., 8, 800-809.
6. Duggan, B.M. et al. (2001) J. Biomol. NMR, 19, 321-329.
7. Emoto, Y. et al. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 182, 1246-1253.
8. Gribenko, A.V. and Makhatadze, G.I. (1998) J. Mol. Biol., 283, 679-694.
9. Gribenko, A.V. et al. (2002) Protein Sci., 11, 1367-1375.
10. Gribenko, A.V. et al. (1998) Protein Sci., 7, 211-215.
11. Hanggi, G. and Braun, W. (1994) FEBS Lett., 44, 147-153.
12. Heizmann, C.W. and Cox, J.A. (1998) Biometals, 11, 383-397.
13. Jurcevic, C. et al. (2003) J. Pathol., 201, 63-74.
14. Kay, L.E. et al. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 10663-10665.
15. Mäler, L. et al. (2002) J. Mol. Biol., 317, 279-290.
16. Potts, B.C.M. et al. (1996) Protein Sci., 5, 2162-2174.
17. Rustandi, R.R. et al. (2002) Biochemistry, 41, 788-796.
18. Smith, S.P. and Shaw, G.S. (1998) Curr. Biol., 6, 211-222.
19. Webber, D.J. et al. (2000) Interaction of Dimeric S100B(ββ) with the Tumor Suppressor Protein: A Model for Ca-Dependent S100-Target Protein Interactions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
20. Zhang, H. et al. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 325, 785-794.