Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 230-238

  Chirikos, Thomas N ^a   Christman, Lisa K ^b   Hunter, Seft ^b   Roetzheim, Richard G ^a,b  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Cost effectiveness analysis; Fecal occult blood tests; Health disparities; Mammography; PAP smears

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; OCCULT BLOOD; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIETY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED STATES;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASMS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3042677239     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Roetzheim R.G., Christman L.K., Jacobsen P.B., et al. A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers. Ann. Family Med. 2004;. (in press)
2. Brown D.W., French M.T., Schweitzer M.E., McGeary K.A., McCoy C.B., Ullman S.G. Economic evaluation of breast cancer screening, a review. Cancer Pract. 7(1):1999;28-33
3. Brown M.L., Fintor L. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: preliminary results of a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 25:1993;113-118
4. Frazier A.I., Colditz G.A., Fuchs C.S., Kuntz K.M. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA. 284(15):2000;1954-1961
5. Helm J.F., Russo M.W., Biddle A.K., Simpson K.N., Ransohoff D.F., Sandler R.S. Effectiveness and economic impact of screening for colorectal cancer by mass fecal occult blood testing. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95(11):2000;3250-3258
6. Linfors K.K., Rosenquist M.D. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. JAMA. 274(11):1995;881-884
7. Mandelblatt J., Freeman H., Winczewski D., et al. The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. Am. J. Public Health. 87(7):1997;1182-1189
8. Pignone M., Saha S., Hoerger T., Mandelblatt J. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 137(2):2002;96-104
9. Theuer C.P., Wagner J.L., Taylor T.H., Brewster W.R., Tran D., McLaren C.E., et al. Racial and ethnic colorectal cancer patterns affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Gastroenterology. 120(4):2001;848-856
10. White E., Urban N., Taylor V. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States. Ann. Rev. Public Health. 14:1993;605-634
11. Bird J.A., McPhee S.J., Jenkins C., Fordham D. Three strategies to promote cancer screening. Med. Care. 28(11):1990;1005-1012
12. Fishman P., Taplin S., Meyer D., Barlow W. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to enhance mammography use. Eff. Clin. Pract. 3(5):2000;213-220
13. Lantz P.M., Stencil D., Lippert M.T., Jaros L., Eaker E.D. Implementation issues and costs associated with a proven strategy for increasing breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2(3):1996;54-59
14. Mohler P.J. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office. Fam. Med. 27(2):1995;117-121
15. Saywell R.M., Champion V.L., Skinner C.S., McQuillen D., Martin D., Maraj M. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening. Prev. Med. 29:1999;374-382
16. Saywell R.M., Champion V.L., Zollinger T.W., et al. The cost-effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population. Am. J. Manag. Care. 9(1):2003;33-44
17. Thompson B., Thompson L.A., Anderson M.R., Hage S., Taylor V., Urban N. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a clinical intervention to increase mammography utilization in an inner city public health hospital. Prev. Med. 35:2002;87-96
18. Weber B.E., Reilly B.M. Enhancing mammography use in the inner city, a randomized trial of intensive case management. Arch. Intern. Med. 157(20):1997;2345-2349
19. Anderson M.R., Hager M., Urban N. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Educ. Behav. 29(6):2002;755-770
20. Costanza M.E., Stoddard A.M., Luckmann R., White M.J., Avrunin J.S., Clemow L. Promoting mammography, results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am. J. Prev. Med. 19(1):2000;39-46
21. Crane L.A., Leakey T.A., Ehrsam G., Rimer B.K., Warnecke R.B. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women. Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 9:2000;923-931
22. Stockdale S.E., Keeler E., Duan N., Derose K.P., Fox S.A. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening. Health Serv. Res. 35(5 pt. I):2000;1037-1057
23. Van Harrison R., Janz N.K., Wolfe R.A., et al. Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant Medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial. Med. Care. 41(3):2003;375-385