The effect of stem length on femoral component positioning in canine total hip arthroplasty

Veterinary Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 272-278

  Dearmin, Michael G ^a,b   Schulz, Kurt S ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; DOG; DOG DISEASE; EVALUATION; FEMUR HEAD; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DOGS; FEMUR HEAD; HIP DYSPLASIA, CANINE; HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 3042671211     PISSN: 01613499     EISSN: 1532950X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04040.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Poss R, Brick GW, Wright JR, et al: The effects of modern cementing techniques on the longevity of total hip arthroplasty. Orth Clinics North Am 19:591-598, 1988
2. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS.: The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 75A:961-975, 1993
3. Dowd JE, Schwendeman LJ, Macaulay W, et al: Aseptic loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty in a canine model. Clin Orthop 319:106-121, 1995
4. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH: Total hip arthroplasty with the use of so-called second generation cementing techniques. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1845-1852, 1995
5. Olmstead ML: Total hip replacement in the dog. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 2:131-140, 1987
6. Montgomery RD, Milton JL, Pernell R, et al: Total hip arthroplasty for treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 22:703-719, 1992
7. Edwards MR, Egger EL, Schwarz PD: Aseptic loosening of the femoral implant after cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 11 cases in 10 dogs (1991-1995). J Am Vet Med Assoc 211:580-586, 1997
8. El-Warrak AO, Olmstead ML, von Rechenberg B, Auer JA: A review of aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 14:115-124, 2001
9. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Belytschko TB, et al: A stress analysis of the femoral stem in total hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:618-624, 1976
10. Harris WH: Clinical considerations, in Morrey BF (ed): Biological, Material, and Mechanical Considerations of Joint Replacement. New York, Raven Press, 1993, pp 1-11
11. Ishiguro N, Kojima T, Ito T: Macrophage activation and migration in interface tissue around loosening total hip arthroplasty components. J Biomed Mater Res 35:399-406, 1997
12. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC, et al: An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:68-78, 1980
13. Ebramzedeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA, et al: The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:77-87, 1994
14. Valdivia GG, Dunbar MJ, Parker DA, et al: Three-dimensional analysis of the cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 393:38-51, 2001
15. Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Kreutzer J, et al: Dependency of cement mantle thickness on femoral stem design and centralizer. J Arthroplasty 16:648-657, 2001
16. Peters CL, Bachus KN, Craig MA, et al: The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:216-224, 2001
17. Ramaniraka NA, Rakatomanana LR, Leyvraz PF: The fixation of the cemented femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:297-303, 2000
18. Estok DM II, Harris WH: A stem design change to reduce peak cement strains at the tip of cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:584-589, 2000
19. Berger RA, Seel MJ, Wood K, et al: Effect of a centralizing device on cement mantle deficiencies and initial prosthetic alignment in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12: 434-443, 1997
20. Estok DM II, Orr TE, Harris WH: Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component. J Arthroplasty 12:40-48, 1997
21. Star MJ, Colwell CW Jr, Kelman GJ, et al: Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J Arthroplasty 9:143-149, 1994
22. Kawate K, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, et al: Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin Orthop 355:70-76, 1998
23. Schultz KS, Vasseur PB, Stover SM, et al: Transverse plane evaluation of the effects of surgical technique on stem positioning and geometry of reconstruction in canine total hip replacment. Am J Vet Res 59:1071-1079, 1998
24. Schultz KS, Stover SM, Kass PH, et al: Effect of surgical technique and use of a rigid centralizing device on stem positioning and geometric reconstruction in the sagittal plane during total hip replacement in canine cadavers. Am J Vet Res 60:1126-1135, 1999
25. Sebestyen P, Marcellin-Little DJ, De Young BA: Femoral medullary infarction secondary to canine total hip arthroplasty. Vet Surg 29:227-236, 2000
26. Dassler CL, Schulz KS, Kass P, et al: The effects of femoral stem and neck length on cement strains in a canine total hip replacement model. Vet Surg 32:37-45, 2003