Developmental morphology of roots and shoots of Podostemum ceratophyllum (Podostemaceae - Podostemoideae)

Rhodora

Volumn 105, Issue 924, 2003, Pages 337-353

  Rutishauser, Rolf ^a   Pfeifer, Evelin ^a   Moline, Philip ^a   Philbrick, C Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b WESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dithecous leaf; Non axillary branching; Podostemum; Stem bifurcation; Stipules; Vegetative morphology

Indexed keywords

CERATOPHYLLUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PODOSTEMACEAE; PODOSTEMUM; PODOSTEMUM CERATOPHYLLUM;

EID: 3042649194     PISSN: 00354902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. AMEKA, K. G., E. PFEIFER, AND R. RUTISHAUSER. 2002. Developmental morphology of Saxicolella amicorum and S. submersa (Podostemaceae: Podostemoideae) from Ghana. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 139: 255-273.
2. ANCIBOR, E. 1990. Anatomia de las especies Argentinas de Podostemum Michaux (Podostemaceae). Parodiana 6: 31-47.
3. CAPERS, R. S. AND D. H. LES. 2001. An unusual population of Podostemum ceratophyllum. (Podostemaceae) in a tidal Connecticut river. Rhodora 103: 219-223.
4. CONNELLY, W. J., D. J. ORTH, AND R. K. SMITH. 1999. Habitat of the river darter, Etheostoma podostemone Jordan, and the decline of riverweed, Podostemum ceratophyllum, in the tributaries of the Roanoke River, Virginia. J. Freshwater Ecol. 14: 93-102.
5. COOK, C. D. K. 1996a. Aquatic Plant Book, 2nd rev. ed. SPB Academic Publ., The Hague, Netherlands.
6. _. 1996b. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of India. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
7. _ AND R. RUTISHAUSER. 2001. Name changes in the Podostemaceae. Taxon 50: 2063-2067.
8. CUSSET, C. 1992. Contribution à l'étude des Podostemaceae: 12. Les genres asiatiques. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 14: 13-54.
9. ENGLER, H. G. A. 1928. Reihe Podostemales, pp. 1-68, 483-484. In: H. G. A. Engler and K. A. E. Prantl, eds., Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2. Aufl. 18a. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany. [published as Volume 1930]
10. EVERITT, D. T. AND J. M. BURKHOLDER. 1991. Seasonal dynamics of macrophyte communities from a stream flowing over granite flatrock in North Carolina, USA. Hydrobiologia 222: 159-172.
11. GRAHAM, S. A. AND C. E. WOOD, JR. 1975. The Podostemaceae in the Southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 56: 456-465.
12. HAMMOND, B. L. 1936. Regeneration of Podostemon ceratophyllum Michx. Bot. Gaz. 97: 834-845.
13. _. 1937. Development of Podostemon ceratophyllum. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 64: 17-36.
14. JÄGER-ZÜRN, I. 1994. Morphologie der Podostemaceae. IV. Zur Kenntnis der dithekischen Blätter bei Podostemum subulatum Gard. (Podostemoideae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 68: 391-419.
15. _. 1999. Developmental morphology of the shoot system of Podostemum subulatum (Podostemaceae - Podostemoideae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 71: 281-334.
16. _. 2000a. Developmental morphology of Podostemum munnarense as compared to related taxa. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122: 341-355.
17. _. 2000b. Developmental morphology of roots and root-born shoots of Podostemum subulatum as compared with Zeylanidium olivaceum (Podostemaceae - Podostemoideae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 55-67.
18. _. 2000c. The unusual ramification mode of Sphaerothylax abyssinica (Wedd.) Warm. (Podostemaceae - Podostemoideae). Flora 195: 200-227.
19. _. 2002. Comparative studies in the morphology of Crenias weddelliana and Maferria indica with reference to Sphaerothylax abyssinica (Podostemaceae: Podostemoideae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 138: 63-84.
20. _ AND M. GRUBERT. 2000. Podostemaceae depend on sticky biofilms with respect to attachment to rocks in waterfalls. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 161: 599-607.
21. KITA, Y. AND M. KATO. 2001. Infrafamilial phylogeny of the aquatic angiosperm Podostemaceae inferred from the nucleotide sequence of the matK gene. Pl. Biol. 3: 156-163.
22. MATHEW, C. J. AND V. K. SATHEESH. 1997. Taxonomy and distribution of the Podostemaceae in Kerala, India. Aquatic Bot. 57: 243-274.
23. MATTHIESEN, F. 1908. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Podostemaceen. Biblioth. Bot. 1908: 1-55.
24. MEIGER, W. 1976. A note on Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. as an indicator of clean streams in and around the Appalachian mountains. Castanea 41: 319-324.
25. MOHAN RAM, H. Y. AND A. SEHGAL. 1992. Podostemaceae - the strange family of aquatic angiosperms. Palaeobotanist 41: 192-197.
26. _ AND _. 1997. In vitro studies on developmental morphology of Indian Podostemaceae. Aquatic Bot. 57: 97-132.
27. _ AND _. 2001. Biology of Indian Podostemaceae, pp. 365-391. In: N. S. Rangaswamy, ed., Phytomorphology Golden Jubilee Issue 2001: Trends in Plant Sciences. International Soc. Plant Morphologists (Prof. I. Usha Rao), Delhi, India.
28. MOLINE, P. 2001. Podostemum and Crenias (Podostemaceae) - American river weeds - infrageneric systematic relationships using molecular and morphological methods. M.Sc. thesis, Inst. Systematische Botanik Univ. Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
29. NOVELO R., A. AND C. T. PHILBRICK. 1997. Taxonomy of Mexican Podostemaceae. Aquatic Bot. 57: 275-303.
30. OTA, M., R. IMAICHI, AND M. KATO. 2001. Developmental morphology of the thalloid Hydrobryum japonicum (Podostemaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 88: 382-390.
31. PHILBRICK, C. T. 1981. Some notes regarding pollination in a New Hampshire population of Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. (Podostemaceae). Rhodora 83: 319-321.
32. _. 1984. Aspects of floral biology, breeding system, and seed and seedling biology in Podostemum ceratophyllum (Podostemaceae). Syst. Bot. 9: 166-174.
33. _ AND A. L. BOGLE. 1988. A survey of floral variation in five populations of Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. (Podostemaceae). Rhodora 90: 113-121.
34. _ AND G. E. CROW. 1983. Distribution of Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. (Podostemaceae). Rhodora 85: 325-341.
35. _ AND _. 1992. Isozyme variation and population structure in Podostemum ceratophyllum Michx. (Podostemaceae): Implications for colonization of glaciated North America. Aquatic Bot. 43: 311-325.
36. _ AND A. NOVELO R. 1993. A fascinating family of aquatic flowering plants. Aquaphyte 13: 1-7.
37. _ AND _. 1995. New World Podostemaceae: Ecological and evolutionary enigmas. Brittonia 47: 210-222.
38. _ AND _. 2001. A new species of Podostemum (Podostemaceae) from the States of Parana and Santa Catarina, Brazil. Novon 11: 92-96.
39. _, _, AND B. E. IRGANG. 2004. Two new genera of Podostemaceae from the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Syst. Bot. 29: in press.
40. RAUH, W. 1937. Die Bildung von Hypokotyl- und Wurzelsprossen und ihre Bedeutung für die Wuchsformen der Pflanzen. Nova Acta Leop. 4: 396-553.
41. ROYEN, P. VAN. 1954. The Podostemaceae of the New World. Part III. Acta Bot. Neerl. 3: 215-263.
42. RUTISHAUSER, R. 1995. Developmental patterns of leaves in Podostemaceae compared with more typical flowering plants: Saltational evolution and fuzzy morphology. Canad. J. Bot. 73: 1305-1317.
43. _. 1997. Structural and developmental diversity in Podostemaceae (river-weeds). Aquatic Bot. 57: 29-70.
44. _ AND M. GRUBERT. 1999. The architecture of Mourera fluviatilis (Podostemaceae): developmental morphology of inflorescences, flowers and seedlings. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 907-922.
45. _ AND _. 2000. Developmental morphology of Apinagia multibranchiata (Podostemaceae) from the Venezuelan Guyanas. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 132: 299-323.
46. _ AND K. A. HUBER. 1991. The developmental morphology of Indotristicha ramosissima (Podostemaceae, Tristichoideae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 178: 195-223.
47. _ AND B. ISLER. 2001. Developmental genetics and morphological evolution of flowering plants, especially bladderworts (Utricularia): Fuzzy Arberian morphology complements classical morphology. Ann. Bot. (London) 88: 1173-1202.
48. _, A. NOVELO R., AND C. T. PHILBRICK. 1999. Developmental morphology of New World Podostemaceae: Marathrum and Vanroyenella. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 29-45.
49. _ AND E. PFEIFER. 2002. Comparative morphology of Cladopus (including Torrenticola, Podostemaceae) from East Asia to north-eastern Australia. Austral. J. Bot. 50: 725-739.
50. SAVOLAINEN, V. ET AL. 2000. Phylogeny of the eudicots: A nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull. 55: 257-309.
51. SCHNELL, R. 1994. Les Stratégies Végétales. Essai de Morphologie Évolutive. Masson, Paris.
52. SOLTIS D. E., M. E. MORT, P. S. SOLTIS, C. HIBSCH-JETTER, E. A. ZIMMER, AND D. MORGAN. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family, Podostemaceae, inferred from 18S rDNA and rbcL sequence data. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 261-272.
53. SUZUKI K., Y. KITA, AND M. KATO. 2002. Comparative developmental anatomy of seedlings in nine species of Podostemaceae (subfamily Podostemoideae). Ann. Bot. 89: 755-765.
54. TROLL, W. 1941. Vergleichende Morphologie der Höheren Pflanzen, Vol.1/3. Borntraeger, Berlin. [pp. 2007-2736].
55. TUR, N. M. 1997. Taxonomy of Podostemaceae in Argentina. Aquatic Bot. 57: 213-241.
56. _. 1999. Podostemaceae. Fl. Paraguay 29: 1-35.
57. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination of endangered status and of critical habitat for the amber darter and the Conasauga logperch. Fed. Reg. 50: 31597-31603.
58. WARMING, E. 1881. Familien Podostemaceae. I. Kongel. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Naturvidensk. Math. Afd. 2: 1-34.
59. _. 1882. Familien Podostemaceae. II. Kongel. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Naturvidensk. Math. Afd. 2: 77-130.
60. _. 1888. Familien Podostemaceae. III. Kongel. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Naturvidensk. Math. Afd. 4: 443-514.