Our (re)registration and accreditation in an international perspective: Time for revision?;Onze (her)registratie en accreditering in internationaal perspectief: Tijd voor een herziening?

Huisarts en Wetenschap

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 279-283

  Hobma, Sjoerd ^a   Dalhuijsen, Johannes ^b   Engels, Yvonne ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Centre for Quality of Care Research   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; AUSTRALIA; BELGIUM; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENMARK; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; ITALY; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; QUALITY CONTROL; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 3042642179     PISSN: 00187070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (35)

1. Irvine D. The performance of doctors 1: Professionalism and self regulation in a changing world. BMJ 1997;314:1540-2.
2. Irvine D. The performance of doctors 2: Maintaining good practice, protecting patients from poor performance. BMI 1997;314:1613-5.
3. Soeren M. Monitoring and improving the technical quality of medical care. A new challenge for policy makers in OECD countries. Parijs: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003.
4. Bashook PG, Parboosingh I. Recertification and the maintenance of competence. BMJ 1998;316:545-8.
5. Kooij L. Huisartsen, kwaliteitseisen en herregistratie. Med Contact 1995;50:1251-3.
6. Raad voor de deskundigheidsbevordering. Beleidsplan Kwaliteit en Deskundigheidsbevordering. Utrecht: LHV/NHG, 1995.
7. http://www.riziv.be/care/nl/doctors/index.htm.
8. Verslag van de Nationale commissie peer review over de lok-werking in 1998 en 1999. http://www.rizivbe/care/nl/doctors/index.htm.
9. Pflicht zur fachlichen Fortbildung. Bundesgesetzblatt 2003;55 Teil 1:2212-3.
10. Böcken J, Butzlaff M, Esche A. Reforming the Health Sector, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 2001.
11. Soeren M. Ad Hoc Group on the OECD Health Project. Parijs: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003.
12. Southgate L, Cox J, David T, Hatch D, Howes A, Johnson N, et al. The General Medical Council's performance procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace. Med Educ 2001;35(suppl):9-19.
13. Southgate L, Campbell M, Cox J, Foulkes J, Jolly B, McCrorie P, et al. The General Medical Council's performance procedures: the development and implementation of tests of competence with examples from general practice. Med Educ 2001;35(suppl):20-8.
14. Southgate L, Cox J, David T, Hatch D, Howes A, Johnson N, et al. The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Procedures. Med Educ 2001;35(suppl):2-8.
15. Southgate L, Pringle M. Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice. BMJ 1999;319:1180-3.
16. GMC. Good medical practice and maintaining good medical practice. Londen: GMC, 1998.
17. GMC. Good Medical Practice for General Practitioners. Londen: GMC, 1999.
18. Newble D, Paget N, McLaren B. Revalidation in Australia and New Zealand: approach of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. BMJ 1999;319:1185-8.
19. Malcolm LA, Wright L. Clinical leadership and quality in primary care organisations in New Zealand. Lyttelton: Aotearoa Health, 2001.
20. Malcolm LA, Mays N. New Zealand's independent practitioner associations: a working model of clinical governance in primary care? BMJ 1999;319:340-2.
21. Buetow SA, Wellingham J. Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:129-35.
22. Pegram R, Wright D. Quality and general practice accreditation: the approach of Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited. Aust Health Rev 1999;22:161-71.
23. Malcolm LA. General practice accreditation is only a small part of a comprehensive quality improvement strategy. Qual Saf Health Care 2003. http://qhc.bmjjournals.com.
24. Southgate L, Dauphinee D. Maintaining standards in British and Canadian medicine: the developing role of the regulatory body. BMJ 1998;316:697-700.
25. Dauphinee D. Revalidation of doctors in Canada. BMJ 1999;319:1188-90.
26. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferrier SN, Langille DB, Muirhead PD, Hayes VM, et al. Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to a multi-source feedback process: a pilot study. Acad Med 2003;78:S42-4.
27. http://www.fmpe.org/en/about/index.htm.
28. Parboosingh J. Revalidation for doctors. BMJ 1998;317:1094-5.
29. Jolly B, McAvoy P, Southgate L. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of patients' experience. BMJ 2001;322:358-9.
30. Eindadvies van de NHG-werkgroep Jaarverslag Beleidsplan. Utrecht: NHG, 1997.
31. O'Rourke A. Revalidation won't be cheap. BMJ 2000;321:242.
32. Kirk SA, Campbell SM, Kennell-Webb S, Reeves D, Roland MO, Marshall MN. Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:421-7.
33. Wakeford R. GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical or fair. BMJ 2000;321:1220.
34. Casparie AF, Sluijs EM, Wagner C, De Bakker DH. Quality systems in Dutch health care institutions. Health Policy 1997;42:255-67.
35. Kalter ESJ. Komt het tot externe certificatie? Med Contact 1995;50:291-3.