Technology: A tool for science learning

Meridian

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Reid Griffin, Angelia ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATIONAL SCIENCE EDUCATION STANDARDS; TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS; VIDEO TRANSCRIPTS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; EDUCATION; GRAPH THEORY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STANDARDS; STUDENTS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 3042639556     PISSN: 10979778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1989). Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, D.C.
2. Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385-395.
3. Bush, G.W. (2001, January). Enhancing education through technology - No child left behind [On-line]. Retrieved May 16, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/ offices/OESE/esea/nclb/partx.html
4. Casio. (2001, July). Casio accessories and products [On-line]. Casio. Retrieved July 8, 2001, from http://www.casio.com/accessories/
5. Cazden, C.B. (1998). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books, Inc.
6. Johnson, J.R. (1989). Technology (report). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
7. Jones, M.G., Brader-Araje, L., Carboni, L.W., Carter, G., Rua, M.J., Banilower, E., & Hatch, H. (2000). Tool time: Gender and students' use of tools, control, and authority. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 760-783.
8. Mergendoller, J.R. (1996). Moving from technological possibility to richer student learning: Revitalized infrastructure and reconstructed pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 43-46.
9. National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Newton, L.R. (2000). Data-logging in practical science: Research and reality. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1247-1259.
11. Office of Educational Technology. (1999, January 25). e-Learning putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children: The national education technology plan [On-line], U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved May 11, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/Technology/elearning/index.html
12. Rakow, S.J. (Ed.). (1998). NSTA pathways to the science standards middle school edition (Middle School ed.). Arlington.
13. Texas Instrument. (2001). Features of the CBL2 [On-line]. Texas Instrument. Retrieved July 21, 2001, from http://education.ti.com/us/product/ tech/datacollection/features/cbl2.html
14. U.S. Department of Education. (1995, January). An invitation to your community-use of technology [On-line]. U.S. Department of Technology. Retrieved May 11, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/CommInvite/technlgy.html
15. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology (Statistical Analysis Report NCES 2000-102). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
16. Wetzel, D.R. (2000). Calculator-based laboratory probeware implementation and integration by middle school science teachers (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(02), AAI9962680.