The medical journal meets the Internet

First Monday

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2002, Pages

  Curran, Charles ^a  

^a Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042629399     PISSN: 13960466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v7i6.964     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anonymous, 2001. "Journal Wars," Economist (12 May), pp. 66-67.
2. Anonymous, 2002. "New manuscript submission: fast track papers only," British Medical Journal, volume 324, p. 908.
3. Craig M. Bingham, G. Higgins, Ross Coleman and Martin B. Van Der Weyden, 1998. "The Medical Journal of Australia Internet Peer-Review Study," Lancet, volume 352, issue 9126, pp. 441-445.
4. Joel E. Dimsdale, 2001. "Medical Publishing: Remembrance of Things Past and Intimations of the Future," Psychosomatic Medicine, volume 63, pp. 1-6.
5. Bernard Donovan, 1998. "The Truth about Peer Review," Learned Publishing, volume 11, pp. 179-184. also at http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/icsu/ donovanppr.htm, accessed 14 April 2002.
6. Robert H. Fletcher and Suzanne W. Fletcher, 1998. "The Future of Medical Journals in the Western World," Lancet, volume 175, suppl. II, pp. 30-33.
7. George A. Gellert, 1995. "The Death of Biomedical Journals. Electronic Journals Supplement Their Paper Cousins," British Medical Journal, volume 311, p. 507.
8. Stevan Harnad, 2001a. "Implementing Peer Review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals," In: R. Peek and G. Newby (editors). Scholarly Publication: The Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, and at http://%20cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ Papers/Harnad96.peer.review.html, accessed 14 April 2002.
9. Stevan Harnad, 2001b. "The Invisible Hand of Peer Review," Southampton Univ. Electronics and Computer Sci. Dept., Southampton, England, http://www.Princeton.edu/~harnad/nature2.html, accessed 14 April 2002.
10. Michael Jacobson, 1998. "Biomedical publishing and the Internet - the Message of the Medium," Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, volume 13, pp. 153-154.
11. John S James, 1992. "(ATN) Current Clinical Trials, New Computerized Journal, Starts July 1," AIDS Treatment News, number 154 (3 July); also at http://www.%20aegis.com/publs/atn/1992/ATN15403.html, accessed 14 April 2002.
12. Horace Freeland Judson, 1994. "Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review," Journal of the American Medical Association, volume 272, pp. 92-94.
13. Ronald E. LaPorte, Eric Marler, Shunichi Akazawa, Francois Sauer, Carlos Gamboa, Chris Shenton, Carlyle Glosser, Anthony Villasenor and Malcolm Maclure, 1995. "The Death of Biomedical Journals," British Medical Journal, volume 310, pp. 1387-1390.
14. Stephen Lock, 1986. A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
15. George Machovec, 1997. "Electronic Journal Market Overview - 1997," Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries, at http://www.coalliance. org/reports/ejournal.htm, accessed 14 April 2002.
16. Barry P Markovitz, 1998. "Time for a New Paradigm in Biomedical Communication," Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, volume 13, pp. 158-167.
17. Sally Morris, 2001. "The Pros and Cons of Electronic Journals," INASP Newsletter, Special Issue: Online Publishing, issue 18, at http://www.inasp.org.uk/newslet/oct01.html, accessed 14 April 2002.
18. Andrew Odlyzko, 1997. "The Economics of Electronic Journals," First Monday, volume 2, number 8 (August), at http://firstmonday.org/issues/ issue2_8/odlyzko/, accessed 14 April 2002.
19. Stuart Peters, 2000. "Presenting a Successful Electronic Journal Subscription Model," First Monday, volume 5, number 9 (September), at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_9/peters/index.html, accessed 14 April 2002.
20. Roy M. Pitkin, 1995. "Popularity Does Not Equal Peer Review," British Medical Journal, volume 311, issue 7003, p. 507.
21. Arnold S. Relman, 1999. "The NIH 'e-Biomed' Proposal - a Potential Threat to the Evaluation and Orderly Dissemination of New Clinical Studies," New England Journal of Medicine, volume 340, pp. 1828-1829.
22. Peter Roberts, 2001. "Scholarly Publication, Peer Review and the Internet," First Monday, volume 6, number 4 (April), at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_4/proberts/, accessed 14 April 2002.
23. Richard Smith, 2001. "Electronic Publishing in Science: The Revolution Is Only Just Beginning," British Medical Journal, volume 322, pp. 627-628.
24. Fujian Song, Alison Eastwood, Simon Gilbody and Lelia Duley, 1999. "The Role of Electronic Journals in Reducing Publishing Bias," Medical Informatics in Internet Medicine, volume 24, pp. 223-229.
25. Fujian Song, Alison J Eastwood, Simon Gilbody, Lelia Duley and Alex J Sutton, 2000. "Publication and Related Biases," Health Technology Assessment, volume 10, issue 4, pp. 1-115.