Electronic journals: Time for a new paradigm in biomedical communication

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 158-167

  Markovitz, Barry P ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERNET; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

EID: 0031869944     PISSN: 08850666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/088506669801300403     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review - part 1. Lancet 1996; 347:1382-1386
2. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review - part 2. Lancet 1996;347:1459-1463
3. Relman AS. Lessons from the Darsee affair. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1415-1417
4. Colaianni LA. Peer review in journals indexed in Index Medicus. JAMA 1994;272:156-158
5. LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al. The death of biomedical journals. Br Med J 1995;310:1387-1390
6. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, et al., eds. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997:7-9
7. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420-2425
8. Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D, et al. Evidence based medicine: a new journal to help doctors identify the information they need. Br Med J 1995;310:1085-1086
9. Hamad S. Implementing peer review on the Net: scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In: Peek R, Newby G, eds. Electronic publishing confronts academia: the agenda for the year 2000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [cited 21 July 1997]. Available from URL: ftp://ftp.princeton. edu/pub/harnad/harnad95.peer.review
10. Morton B. Is the journal as we know it an article of faith? An open letter to the faculty. In: The Public-Access Computer Systems Review 1997; 8: [cited 21 July 1997]. Available from URL: http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v8/n2/mort8n2.html
11. Lowe HJ, Lomax EC, Polonkey SE. The world wide web: a review of an emerging Internet-based technology for the distribution of biomedical information. J Am Med Inform Ass. 1996;3:1-14
12. Spooner SA. On-line resources for pediatricians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1160-1168
13. Palen M. Guide to the Internet: introducing the Internet. Br Med J 1995;311:1422-1425 [cited 21 July 1997]. Available from URL: http://www.bmj.com/archive/7017ed2.htm
14. Taubes G. Electronic preprints point the way to 'author empowerment.' Science 1996;271:767-768
15. Willis J. Bridging the gap between traditional and electronic scholarly publishing. Presented at 1995 EDUCOM Conference, Portland, OR [cited 21 July 1997]. Available from URL: http://www.coe.uh.edu/̃brobin/Educom95/EducomJW/index.html
16. Kale R. Health information for the developing world. Br Med J 1994;309;939-942
17. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Policies for posting biomedical information on the Internet. JAMA 1997; 277:1808
18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA 1997; 277:927-934
19. Doyle E. Should original medical research go straight to the Net? ACP Observer 1996; April: [cited 21 July 1997]. Available from URL: http://www.acponline.org/journals/news/apr96/physnet.htm
20. Delamothe T. Preprint debate [cited 14 May 1998]. Available from URL: http://www.bmj.com/preprint.htm
21. Protocol reviews [cited 14 May 1998]. Available from URL: http://www.thelancet.com/newlancet/reg/author/protocoll.html