Storage phosphor plates: How durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 057-069

  Bedard, Aurelija ^b   Davis, Tracy Dawn ^b   Angelopoulos, Chrisfos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Digital radiography; Durability; Photostimulable radiography; Storage phosphor plates

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; INDUSTRY; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STORAGE PHOSPHOR PLATE; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTIFACT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; RECYCLING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ARTIFACTS; EQUIPMENT REUSE; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 3042622664     PISSN: 15263711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-5-2-57     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Goaz and White. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994.
2. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Jan;27(1):3-11. Review.
3. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, et. al. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jan;85(1):113-8.
4. Naitoh M, Yuasa H, Toyama M, et. al. Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jan;85(1):107-12.
5. Price C, Ergul N. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997 Jan;26(1):45-52.
6. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Sep;82(3):344-50.
7. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Nov;82(5):585-9.
8. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, et al. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1995 Nov;24(4):250-4.
9. Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD, et al. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992 Nov;74(5):652-60.
10. Sanderink GC, Miles DA. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):249-55, v.
11. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):215- 24. Review.
12. Wenzel A, Grondahl HG. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J. 1995 Feb;45(1):27-34. Review. Erratum in: Int Dent J 1995 Dec;45(6):391.
13. Wenzel A, Grondahl HG. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J. 1995 Feb;45(1):27-34. Review. Erratum in: Int Dent J 1995 Dec;45(6):391.