Effects of live, videotaped, or written instruction on learning an upper-extremity exercise program

Physical Therapy

Volumn 84, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 622-633

  Reo, Julie Allen ^a   Mercer, Vicki Stemmons ^b  

^a Univ of N Carolina at Chapel Hill ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Instruction; Modeling; Motor learning

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARM EXERCISE; ARTICLE; COST CONTROL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEACHING; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 3042621300     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/84.7.622     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Meredith P, Emherton M, Wood C. New directions in information for patients. BMJ. 1995;311:4-5.
2. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R. Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65:316-323.
3. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Cardinale C, et al. Learning a partial-weight- bearing skill: effectiveness of two forms of feedback. Phys Ther. 1996; 76:985-993.
4. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull. 1984;95: 355-386.
5. Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. J Mot Behav. 1992;24:187-196.
6. Riolo L. Effects of modeling errors on the acquisition and retention of sterile hand washing task. Percept Mot Skills. 1997;84:19-26.
7. McCullagh P, Caird JK. Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1990;18:107-116.
8. Adams JA. Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1986;12: 89-98.
9. Lee TD, Swanson LR, Hall AL. What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Phys Ther. 1991;71:150-156.
10. Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Modeling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration. J Sports Sci. 2002;20:793-811.
11. Carroll WR, Bandura A. Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. J Mot Behav. 1985;17:269-281.
12. Carroll WR, Bandura A. Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: a causal analysis. J Mot Behav. 1990;22:85-97.
13. Weeks DL, Anderson LP. The interaction of observational learning with overt practice: effects on motor skill learning. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000;104:259-271.
14. Feltz DL. The effects of age and number of demonstrations on modeling of from and performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1982;53:291-296.
15. Sidaway B, Hand MJ. Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1993;64:122-126.
16. Wright DK, Shea CH. Cognition and motor skill acquisition: contextual dependencies. In: Reynolds CR, ed. Cognitive Assessment: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York, NY: Plentium Press; 1994: 89-106.
17. Gomez GE, Gomez EA. Learning of psychomotor skills: laboratory versus patient care setting. J Nurs Educ. 1987;26:20-24.
18. Walker MP, Brakefield T, Hobson A, Stickgold R. Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature. 2003; 425:616-620.
19. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:429-428.
20. Norton BJ, Ellis JB. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Metrecom for length measurements on inanimate objects. Phys Ther. 1993;73:266-274.
21. Blalock HM Jr, ed. Social Statistics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1979.
22. McCullagh P, Stiehl J, Weiss MR. Developmental modeling effects on the quantitative and qualitative aspects of motor performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1990;61:344-350.
23. Shea CH, Wright DL, Wulf G, Whitacre C. Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. J Mot Behav. 2000;32:27-36.
24. Weeks DL, Brubaker J, Byrt J, et al. Videotape instruction versus illustrations for influencing quality of performance, motivation, and confidence to perform simple and complex exercises in healthy subjects. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2002;18:65-73.
25. Friedrich M, Cermak T, Maderbacher P. The effect of brochure use versus therapist teaching on patients performing therapeutic exercise and on changes in impairment status. Phys Ther. 1996;76:1082-1088.
26. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
27. Cools AM, Witvrouw EE, Declercq GA, et al. Scapular muscle recruitment patterns: trapezius muscle latency with and without impingement symptoms. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:542-549.
28. Townsend H, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J. Electromyographic analysis of the glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:264-272.
29. Vander Linden DW, Cauraugh JH, Greene TA. The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther. 1993;73:79-87.
30. Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 2nd ed. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc; 1988:578.
31. Weeks DL. A comparison of modeling modalities in the observational learning of an externally paced skill. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63: 373-380.
32. Michielutte R, Bahnson J, Dignan MB, Schroeder EM. The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure. J Cancer Educ. 1992;7:251-260.