Navigating on the Internet in search of health information: All that glitters is not gold...;Navegando en Internet en busca de información sanitaria: No es oro todo lo que reluce...

Atencion Primaria

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 391-399

  Mira, José J ^a,b   Perez Jover V ^a   Lorenzo, S ^b  

^a MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO FUNDACIÓN ALCORCÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; HEALTH EDUCATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; ONLINE SYSTEM; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SPAIN;

EID: 3042602455     PISSN: 02126567     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13060754     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Jadad AR, Sigouin C, Cocking L, Whelan T, Browman G. Internet use among physicians, nurses, and their patients. JAMA 2001;286: 1451-2.
2. Carrasco G. Medicina basada en la evidencia «electró nica» (e-MBE): metodología, ventajas y limitaciones. Rev Calidad Asistencial 2002;17:113-25.
3. Eysenbach G, Ryoung E, Diepsen TL. Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine. BMJ 1999;319:1-5.
4. Jadad AR, Delamothe T. From electronic gadgets to better health: where is the knowledge? BMJ 2003;327:300-1.
5. Gutierrez U, Blanco A. Información para pacientes en español en Internet. Aten Primaria 2001;28:283-8.
6. Sigouin C, Jadad A. Awareness of sources of peer-reviewed research evidence on the Internet. JAMA 2002;287:2867-9.
7. Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ 2000;320:1713-6.
8. Estudio General de Medios febrero-marzo 2003. Instituto de Estadística Comunidad de Madrid [consultado 1/05/2003]. Disponible en: http://www8.madrid.org/iestadis/es150403.htm
9. The Society for Adolescent Medicine [consultado 29/04/2003]. Disponible en: http://www.adolescenthealth.org/
10. Miller TE, Derse AR. Between strangers: the practice of medicine online. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:168-79.
11. El marco de desarrollo de la e-salud en España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Doc. ISCIII/AITYSI/20010213 [consultado 24/3/2003]. Disponible en: http://api.isciii.es/e-salud/e-salud.html
12. García-Eroles L, Illa C, Arias A, Casas M. Los top 20 2000: objetivos, ventajas y limitaciones del método. Rev Calidad Asistencial 2001;16:107-16.
13. US News [consultado 8/1/2003]. Disponible en: www.usnews.com
14. Marshall MN, Shekekke P, Leatherman S, Brook RH. The public release of performance data? What do we to gain? A review of the evidence? JAMA 2000;283:1866-74.
15. Mira JJ, Lorenzo S, Martínez A. Difusión de resultados asistenciales: ventajas e inconvenientes de los report cards. Rev Calidad Asistencial 2003;18:209-24.
16. Jacob J. Consumer access to health care information: its effect on the physician-patient relationship. Alaska Med 2002;44:75-82.
17. Murray E, Davis H, See Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. BMJ 2001;323:493-6.
18. Eysenbach G, Köhler Ch. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002;324:573-7.
19. Diario del Consumidor [consultado 29/04/03]. Disponible en: www.consumer.es/web/es/actualidad
20. Abreu González R, Abreu Reyes JA, Ferrer-Roca O. Pacientes on-line: un reto para el médico. Arch Soc Canar Oftal 2001; 12 [consultado 29/04/03]. Disponible en: http://www.oftalmo.com/sco/revista-12/ indi01.htm
21. Whelan T, Gafni A, Charles C, Levine M. Lessons learned from the decision board: a unique and evolving decision aid. Health Expectations 2000;3:69-76.
22. Mira JJ, Rodríguez-Marín J. Análisis de las condiciones en las que los pacientes toman decisiones responsables. Med Clin (Barc) 2001;116:104-10.
23. Report on the Online Health Care Revolution [consultado 28/04/2003]. Disponible en: http://www.pewinternet.org
24. Casino G. Salud de self-service. Escepticemia 2001;113 [consultado 30/04/03]. Disponible en: http://db2.doyma.es/cgi-bin/wdbcgi.exe/doyma/ pescepticemia.plantilla?pident=1433
25. Pandolfini Ch, Bonati M. Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation. BMJ 2002;324:582-3.
26. Gilliam AD, Speake WJ, Scholefield JH, Beckingham IJ. Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003;85:44-6.
27. Health On The Net Foundation [consultado 28/04/03]. Disponible en: http://www.hon.ch/
28. Louro González A, González Guitián C. Portales sanitarios para la atención primaria. Aten Primaria 2001;27:346-50.
29. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide wed: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 1997;314:1875-9.
30. Wyatt J. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web. BMJ 1997; 314:1879-81.
31. Sanz A. Publicidad de medicamentos y productos milagro en Internet. Farmacia Clínica 1998;15:243-7,
32. Sanz A. Calidad de la información de medicamentos en Internet: evaluación de la información al paciente sobre antirretrovíricos. Atención Farmacéutica 1999;1:64-9.
33. Li L, Irvin E, Guzman J, Bombardier C. Surgery for back pain patients. Spine 2001;26:545-57.
34. Suárez-Almazor ME, Kendall Ch, Dorgan M. Surfing the Net. Information on the World Wide Web for persons with arthritis: patient empowerment of patient deceit? J Rheumatol 2001;28:185-91.
35. Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe P, Khan K. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ 2002;324:581-2.
36. Bessell T, McDonald S, Silagy Ch, Anderson J, Hiller J, Sansom L. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expectations 2002;5:28-37.
37. Ávila de Tomás JF, Portillo Boyero BE, Pajares Izquierdo JM. Calidad en la información biomédica existente en Internet. Aten Primaria 2001;28:674-9.
38. Berland G, Elliot MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, et al. Health information on the Internet. Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001;285:2612-21.
39. Hain T. Improving the quality of health information: the contribution of C-H-I-Q. Health Expectations 2002;5:270-3.
40. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web. A systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287:2691-700.
41. Gagliardi A, Jadad A. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyager with an unclear destination. BMJ 2002;324: 569-73.
42. Smith SP. Internet visits: a new approach to chronic disease management. J Med Pract Manage 2002;17:330-2.
43. Schaffer JL, Plona S, Omori S, Miller H, Harris CM. The consult is real, the visit is virtual. J Healthc Inf Manag 2002;16:30-4.
44. Bessell TL, Anderson JN, Silagy CA, Sansom LN, Hiller JE. Surfing, self-medicating and safety: buying non-prescription and complementary medicines via the internet. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:88-92.
45. Canal Salud [consultado 26/04/03]. Disponible en: http://www.canalsalud. com/massa-lud/lasdiez.htm
46. Jadad A, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet. Navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279:611-4.
47. Risk A, Petersen C. Health information on the Internet. Quality issues and international initiatives. JAMA 2002;287:2713-5.
48. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield F. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites. BMJ 1999;318:647-9.
49. Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Two wrongs don't make a right: harm aggravated by inaccurate information on internet. Pediatrics 2002;109:522-3.
50. Delamothe T. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. BMJ 2000;321:843-4.