Consumer health informatics

British Medical Journal

Volumn 320, Issue 7251, 2000, Pages 1713-1716

  Eysenbach, Gunther ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSUMER; ELECTRONICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0034709749     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. 1 Hersey JC, Matheson J, Lohr KN. Consumer health informatics and patient decision-making. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1997. (AHCPR research report No 98-N001.)
2. 2 Patrick K, Koss S. Consumer health information: white paper. http://nii.nist.gov/pubs/chi.html (accessed 12 June 2000). (Working draft 15 May 1995.)
3. 3 United States General Accounting Office. Consumer health informatics: emerging issues. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1996. (No T-AIMD-96-134.)
4. 4 Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH. Medical informatics. An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. JAMA 1990;263:1114-20.
5. 5 Shortliffe EH, Perrault L. Medical informatics:computer applications in health care. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990.
6. 6 Van Bemmel JH, Musen MA. Handbook of medical informatics. Heidelberg: Springer, 1997.
7. 7 Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up - and there's no going back. BMJ 1999;319:719-20.
8. 8 Eysenbach G, Sa ER, Diepgen TL. Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine. BMJ 1999;319 (13 Nov). Full version: www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7220/1294 (accessed 31 May 2000).
9. 9 Jadad AR. Promoting partnerships: challenges for the internet age. BMJ 1999;319:761-4.
10. 10 Smith R. The future of healthcare systems. BMJ 1997;314:1495-6.
11. 11 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Evaluation of cyberdocs. Lancet 1998;352:1526.
12. 12 Pies R. Cybermedicine [letter]. N Engl J Med 1998;339:638-9.
13. 13 Pencheon D. NHS direct: evaluate, integrate, or bust. BMJ 1998;317:1026-7.
14. 14 Pencheon D. Matching demand and supply fairly and efficiently. BMJ 1998;316:1665-7.
15. 15 Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279:611-4.
16. 16 Wyatt J, Keen J. The NHS's new information strategy. BMJ 1998;317:900.
17. 17 Ferguson T. Health online and the empowered medical consumer. Jl Comm J Qual Improv 1997;23:251-7.
18. 18 Friedman CP, Elstein AS, Wolf FM, Murphy GC, Franz TM, Heckerling PS, et al. Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems. JAMA 1999;282:1851-6.
19. 19 Bouhaddou O, Lambert JG, Miller S. Consumer health informatics: knowledge engineering and evaluation studies of medical HouseCall. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:612-6.
20. 20 Coleman V. Why patients should keep their own records. J Med Ethics 1984;10:27-8.
21. 21 Baldry M, Cheal C, Fisher B, Gillett M, Huet V. Giving patients their own records in general practice: experience of patients and staff. BMJ 1986;292:596-8.
22. 22 Gilhooly ML, McGhee SM. Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession. J Med Ethics 1991;17:138-43.
23. 23 eEurope: an information society for all. Communication on a commission initiative for the special European Council of Lisbon, 23 and 24 March 2000. http://europe.eu.int/comm/information/society/ eeurope/pdf/com081299 en.pdf (accessed 30 March 2000).
24. 24 Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Gilmour WH, Atkinson JM, Barrett A, et al. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ 1999;319:1241-7.
25. 25 Kreuter M, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailoring health messages. Customizing communication with computer technology. London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2000.
26. 26 Rind DM, Kim JH, Sturges EA. SeniorMed: connecting patients to their medication records. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:1147.
27. 27 Barry MJ. Involving patients in medical decisions: how can physicians do better? JAMA 1999;282:2356-7.
28. 28 Brennan PF, Stromhom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5:257-62.
29. 29 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ. 1998;317:1496-1500.
30. 30 Patrick K, Robinson TN, Alemi F, Eng TR. Policy issues relevant to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Am J Prev Med 1999;16:35-12. (Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.)
31. 31 Gustafson DH, Robinson TN, Ansley D, Adler L, Brennan PF. Consumers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Am J Prev Med 1999;16:23-29. (Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.)
32. 32 Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Labeling and filtering of medical information on the Internet. Methods Inf Med 1999;38;80-8.
33. 33 Shepperd S, Charnock D, Gann B. Helping patients access high quality health information. BMJ 1999;319:764-6.
34. 34 Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105-111.
35. 35 Rippen H, Risk A. e-Health ethics draft code. J Med Internet Res 2000;2:e2. www.symposion.com/jmir/2000/1/e2/ (accessed 2 Apr 2000).
36. 36 Irving L, Klegar-Levy K, Everette DW, Reynolds T, Lader W. falling through the net: defining the digital divide. A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Dept of Commerce, 1909.
37. 37 Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971;i:405-12.