On the tempo and quantum of first marriages in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland: Changes in mean and variance

Demographic Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2004, Pages 231-263

  Winkler Dworak, Maria ^a   Engelhardt, Henriette ^a  

^a VIENNA INSTITUTE OF DEMOGRAPHY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Austria; Germany; Marriage

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042575166     PISSN: 14359871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2004.10.9     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1998).Was kommt nach der Familie? Einblicke in eine neue Lebensform. München: Beck.
2. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81, 813-846.
3. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, Supplement 82, S11-S26.
4. Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family (Enl. ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Bloom, D. E. and N. G. Bennett (1990). Modeling American marriage patterns. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 1009-1017.
6. Bongaarts, J. and G. Feeney (1998a). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review 24, 271-291.
7. Bongaarts, J. and G. Feeney (1998b). On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Reply. Population and Development Review 26, 560-564.
8. Bumpass, L. and H.-H. Lu (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies 54, 29-41.
9. Calot, G. (1998). Two centuries of Swiss demographic history. Neuchâtel and Paris: Swiss Federal Statistical Office and Observatoire démographique européen.
10. Cherlin, A. J. (2000). Toward a new home socioeconomics of union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, Chapter 7, pp. 126-144. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
11. Coale, A. J. and D. R. McNeil (1972). The distribution by age of the frequency of first marriage in a female cohort. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67(340), 743-749.
12. Diekmann, A. (1987). Determinanten des Heiratsalters und des Scheidungsrisikos. Unveröffentlichte Habilitationsschrift, Universität München, Institut für Soziologie.
13. Engelhardt, H. (2002). Zur Dynamik von Ehescheidungen: Theoretische und empirische Analysen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
14. Ermisch, J. and M. Francesconi (2000). Cohabitation in Great Britain: not for long, but here to stay. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 163, 153-171.
15. Gisser, R., L. Wilk, M. Beham, and M. Bacher (1990). Familiale Wirklichkeit aus demographischer und soziologischer Sicht. In R. Gisser, L. Reiter, H. Schattovits, and L. Wilk (Eds.), Lebenswelt Familie. Wien: Institut für Ehe und Familie.
16. Goldstein, J. R. (2002). The tempo and quantum of first marriage. Draft.
17. Goldstein, J. R. and C. T. Kenney (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage foregone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66, 506-519.
18. Goode,W. J. (1982). The Family. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Heckman, J. J., V. J. Hotz, and J. R. Walker (1985). New evidence on the timing and spacing of births. American Economic Review 75, 179-184.
20. Heilig, G. (1985). Die Heiratsneigung lediger Frauen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: 1950-1984. Zeitschrift für Bevülkerungswissenschaft 11(4), 519-547.
21. Kiernan, K. (1999). Cohabitation in Western Europe. Population Trends 96, 33-40.
22. Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, pp. 40-58. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
23. Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15, 1-25.
24. Kim, Y. J. and R. Schoen (2000). On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Limits to the Bongaarts-Feeney adjustment. Population and Development Review 26, 554-559.
25. Kohler, H.-P. and J. A. Ortega (2002). Tempo-adjusted period parity progression measures, fertility postponement and completed cohort fertility. Demographic Research 6(6), 91-144.
26. Kohler, H.-P. and D. Philipov (2001). Variance effects in the Bongaarts-Feeney formula. Demography 38, 1-16.
27. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries, pp. 17-62. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28. Liang, Z. (2000). The Coale-McNeil Model: Theory, Generalisation and Application. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
29. Lundberg, S. and R. A. Pollak (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4), 139-158.
30. Lutz, W., B. O'Neill, and S. Scherbov (2003). Europe's population at a turning point. Science 299, 1991-1992.
31. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review 12, 53-65.
32. McLanahan, S. and G. Sandefur (1984). Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33. Murphy,M. (2000). The evolution of cohabitation in Britain, 1960-95. Population Studies 54, 43-56.
34. Ng, C. N. and P. C. Young (1990). Recursive estimation and forecasting of non-stationary economic times series. Journal of Forecasting 9(2), 173-204.
35. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988, November). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3), 563-591.
36. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). The continuing importance of men's economic position in marriage formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, Chapter 14, pp. 283-301. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
37. Oppenheimer, V. K. and A. Lewin (1999). Career development and marriage formation in a period of rising inequality: Who is at risk? What are their prospects? In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, and M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Transitions to Adulthood in A Changing Economy: No Work, No Family, No Future?, Chapter 13, pp. 189-225. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
38. Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt (Ed.) (1988). Demographisches Jahrbuch 1986, Wien. Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt.
39. Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt (Ed.) (1993). Demographisches Jahrbuch 1992, Wien. Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt.
40. Péron, Y. (1991). Les indices du moment de la nuptialité des célibataires. Population 46(6), 1429-1440.
41. Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, Married, or Single. Aldershot: Avebury.
42. Prioux, F. (1992). Les accidents de la nuptialité autrichienne. Population 47, 353-388.
43. Scheller, G. (1985). Erklärungsversuche des Wandels im Heirats- und Familiengründungsalter seit 1950. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 11(4), 549-576.
44. Sobotka, T. (2003). Tempo-quantum and period-cohort interplay in fertility changes in Europe: Evidence from Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. Demographic Research 8(6), 151-214.
45. Statistik Austria (Ed.) (2001). Demographisches Jahrbuch 2000,Wien. Statistik Austria.
46. Statistik Austria (Ed.) (2003). Demographisches Jahrbuch 2001-2002, Wien. Statistik Austria.
47. The MathWorks, Inc. (2002). Matlab 6.5.
48. Toulemon, L. (1997). Cohabitation is here to stay. Population: An English Selection 9, 11-56.
49. van Imhoff, E. and N. Keilman (2000). On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Comment. Population and Development Review 26, 549-553.
50. Waite, L. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography 32, 483-507.
51. Yi, Z. and K. C. Land (2001). A sensitivity analysis of the Bongaarts-Feeney method for adjusting bias in observed period total fertility rates. Demography 38, 17-28.
52. Young, P. C. (1994). Time-variable parameter and trend estimation in non-stationary economic times series. Journal of Forecasting 13(2), 179-210.