The authority structure problem of computer supported collaborative concept mapping system for elementary students

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 57-60

  Chiu, Chiung Hui ^a  

^a National Tainan Teachers College   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MAPPING;

DEPENDENT VARIABLES; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; ELEMENTARY STUDENTS; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; STRUCTURE DESIGN; STUDENT ATTITUDES; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; TAIWANESE STUDENTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 3042565736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2001.943854     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin. Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, 1984.
2. J. A. Heinze-Fry and J. D. Novak. Concept Mapping Brings Long-term Movement toward Meaningful Leaming. Science Education, 74(4), 461-472, 1990.
3. P. B. Horton, A. A. McConney, M. Gallo, A. L. Woods, G. J. Senn, and D. Hamelin. An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Concept Mapping as an Instructional Tool. Science Education, 77, 95-1 11, 1993.
4. W. M. Roth. Student Views of Collaborative Concept Mapping: An Emancipatory Research Project. Science Education, 78, 1-34, 1994.
5. W. M. Roth and A. Roychoudhury. The Concept Map as a Tool for the Collaborative Construction of Knowledge: A Microanalysis of High School Physics Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 503-534, 1993.
6. L. Anderson-Inman and M. Homey. Computer-based Concept Mapping: Enhancing Literacy with Tools for Visual Thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(4), 302-306, 1996/1997
7. W. K. Chung, F. ONeil, E. Herl, and A. Dennis. Use of Networked Collaborative Concept Mapping to Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, 1997. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 225)
8. S. Greenberg and D. Marwood. Real Time Groupware as a Distributed System: Concurrency Control and Its Effect on the Interface. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 201-2 17, 1994.
9. J. F. Patterson, R. D. Hill, S. L. Rohall, and W. S. Meeks. Rendezvous: An Architecture for Synchronous Multi-user Applications. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1990.
10. G. Hill. Group versus Individual Performance: Are N+I Heads Better than One? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 5 17-539, 1982.
11. D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. Positive Interdependency: Key to Effective Cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and N. Miller (Eds. ), Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning, pages 174-199, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992.
12. L. H. Cross. Grading Students (ERIC/AE Digest Series EDO-TM-95-5). In ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, Washington, DC, 1995. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 239)
13. L. E. Toothacker. Multiple Comparisons Procedures, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1993.