Factors influencing the ability to detect motion reversals in rotation simulations

Spatial Vision

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 201-234

  Petersik, J Timothy ^a   Dannemiller, James L ^b,c  

^a RIPON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Rotation reversal perception; Structure from motion

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERPOLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SURFACE PHENOMENA;

POLAR-PROJECTION STIMULI; ROTATION-REVERSAL PERCEPTION; STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION;

MOTION CONTROL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ROTATION;

EID: 3042547853     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568041866015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Braddick, O. J. (1993). Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing, Trends in Neurosciences 16, 263-268.
2. Braunstein, M. L. (1976). Depth Perception through Motion. Academic Press, New York.
3. Braunstein, M. L. (1994). Structure from motion, in: Visual Detection of Motion, Smith, A. T. and Snowden, R. J. (Eds), pp. 367-393. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
4. Hildreth, E. C., Ando, H., Andersen, R. A. and Treue, S. (1995). Recovering three-dimensional structure from motion with surface reconstruction, Vision Research 35, 117-137.
5. Jiang, Y., Pantle, A. J. and Mark, L. S. (1998). Visual inertia of rotating 3-D objects, Perception and Psychophysics 60, 275-286.
6. Li, H.-C. and Kingdom, F. A. A. (1999). Feature-specific segmentation in perceived structure-from-motion, Vision Research 39, 881-886.
7. Petersik, J. T. (1979a). Perception of simultaneous simulations of two rotating spheres in the same visual locale, Bull. Psychonomic Soc. 14, 131-134.
8. Petersik, J. T. (1979b). Three-dimensional object constancy: coherence of a simulated rotating sphere in noise, Perception and Psychophysics 25, 328-335.
9. Petersik, J. T. (1980). The effects of spatial and temporal factors on the perception of stroboscopic rotation simulations, Perception 9, 271-283.
10. Petersik, J. T. (1987). Recovery of structure from motion: Implications for a performance theory based on the structure-from-motion theorem, Perception and Psychophysics 42, 355-364.
11. Petersik, J. T. (1991). Perception of three-dimensional angular rotation, Perception and Psychophysics 50, 465-474.
12. Petersik, J. T. (1996). The detection of stimuli rotating in depth amid linear motion and rotating distractors, Vision Research 36, 2271-2281.
13. Qian, N., Anderson, R. A. and Adelson, E. H. (1994). Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics, J. Neurosci. 14, 7357-7366.
14. Ramachandran, V. S., Cobb, S. and Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (1988). Perception of 3-D structure from motion: The role of velocity gradients and segmentation boundaries, Perception and Psychophysics 44, 390-393.
15. Reichardt, W. (1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system, in: Sensory Communication, Rosenblith, W. A. (Ed.), pp. 303-317. Wiley, New York.
16. Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness, Visual Cognition 7, 1-15.
17. Smith, A. T., Curran, W. and Braddick, O. J. (1999). What motion distributions yield global transparency and spatial segmentation? Vision Research 39, 1121-1132.
18. Snowden, R. J., Treue, S., Erickson, R. G. and Andersen, R. A. (1991). The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion, J. Neurosci, 11, 2768-2785.
19. Treue, S., Andersen, R. A., Ando, H. and Hildreth, E. C. (1995). Structure-from-motion: Perceptual evidence for surface interpolation, Vision Research 35, 139-148.
20. Ullman, S. (1979), The Interpretation of Visual Motion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. van Santen, J. P. H. and Sperling, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichard detectors, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. (A) 2, 300-321.