The detection of stimuli rotating in depth amid linear motion and rotating distractors

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 15, 1996, Pages 2271-2281

  Petersik, J Timothy ^a  

^a RIPON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Motion perception; Short range process; Structure from motion; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR SYSTEM; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STIMULUS;

EID: 0030222354     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00295-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Braunstein, M. (1976). Depth perception through motion. New York: Academic Press.
2. Dick M., Ullman S., Sagi D. Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. Science. 237:1987;400-402.
3. Dick M., Ullman S., Sagi D. Short- and long-range processes in structure-from-motion. Vision Research. 31:1991;2025-2028.
4. Julesz, B. (1990). Early vision is bottom-up, except for focal attention. Cold Spring Harbor symposium on quantitative biology (Vol. LV, pp. 973-978). Long Island, NY.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
5. Liter J.C., Braunstein M.L., Hoffman D.D. Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception. 22:1993;1441-1465.
6. Mather G. Early motion processes and the kinetic depth effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 41A(1):1989;183-198.
7. Neisser U. Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. American Journal of Psychology. 76:1963;376-385.
8. Palmer J. Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research. 34:1994;1703-1721.
9. Petersik J.T. The two-process distinction in apparent motion. Psychological Bulletin. 106:1989;107-127.
10. Petersik J.T. Global cooperativity of the short-range process. Perception & Psychophysics. 47:1990;360-368.
11. Petersik J.T. Effects of adaptation to apparent movement on recovery of structure from motion. Spatial Vision. 5:1991;279-289.
12. Petersik J.T. Perception of three-dimensional angular rotation. Perception & Psychophysics. 50:1991;465-474.
13. Petersik J.T., Pufahl R., Krasnoff E. Failure to find an absolute retinal limit of a putative short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research. 23:1983;1663-1670.
14. Petersik J.T., Shepard A., Malsch R. A three-dimensional motion aftereffect produced by prolonged adaptation to a rotation simulation. Perception. 13:1984;489-497.
15. Shulman G. Attentional modulation of mechanisms that analyze rotation in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;726-737.
16. Todd J.T., Akerstrom R.A., Reichel F.D., Hayes W. Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors. Perception & Psychophysics. 43:1988;179-188.
17. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
18. Treue S., Husain M., Anderson R.A. Human perception of structure from motion. Vision Research. 31:1991;59-75.
19. Verghese P., Nakayama K. Stimulus discriminability in visual search. Vision Research. 34:1994;2453-2467.