Finance equalization and within-school equity: The relationship between education spending and the social distribution of achievement

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 269-283

  Wenglinsky, Harold ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032264193     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/01623737020004269     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Armor, D. J. (1972). School and family effects on Black and White achievement: A re-examination of the USOE data. In F. Mosteller & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity (pp. 118-229). New York: Random House.
2. Barro, S. M. (1994). Cost-of-education differentials across the states. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3. Barton, P., Goertz, M., & Coley, R. (1991). The state of inequality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (1996). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
7. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8. Fortune, J. C., & O'Neil, J. S. (1994). Production function analyses and the study of educational funding equity: A methodological critique. Journal of Education Finance, 20(Summer), 21-46.
9. Gamoran, A. ( 1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57(6), 812-828.
10. Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57, 415-435.
11. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.
12. Gustafsson, J. E., & Stahl, P. A. (1997). STREAMS user's guide: Version 1.7. Molndal, Sweden: Multivariate Ware.
13. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage Publications.
14. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-65.
15. Hanushek, E. A. (1994). Money might matter somewhere: A response to Hedges, Laine, and Greenwald. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 5-8.
16. Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. In G. T. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 43-73). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
17. Hanushek, E. A. ( 1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
18. Hedges, L. V., & Greenwald, R. (1996). Have times changed? The relation between school resources and student performance. In G. T. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 74-92). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
19. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994.) Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
20. Johnson, E. (1989). Considerations and techniques for the analysis of NAEP data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14(4), 303-334.
21. Johnson, E. (1994). Overview of part I: The design and implementation of the 1992 NAEP. In E. Johnson & J. E. Carlson (Eds.), The NAEP 1992 technical report (pp. 9-32). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
22. Johnson, E., Mislevy, R. J., & Thomas, N. (1994). Scaling procedures. In E. Johnson & J. E. Carlson (Eds.), The NAEP 1992 technical report (pp. 241-256). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
23. Johnson, E., Rust, K., & Wallace, C. (1994). Weighting procedures and the estimation of sampling variance. In E. Johnson & J. E. Carlson (Eds.), The NAEP 1992 technical report (pp. 193-239). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
24. Jones, J. D., Vanfossen, B. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (1995). Individual and organizational predictors of high school track placement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 287-300.
25. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241-270.
26. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 128-151.
27. Monk, D. H. (1992). Educational productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 307-332.
28. Mullis, I. V. S., Dossey, J. A., Owen, E. H., & Phillips, G. W. (1993). NAEP 1992 mathematics report card for the nation and the states. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
29. Murnane, R. J., & Levy, F. (1995). Evidence from fifteen schools in Austin, Texas. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 93-97). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
30. Muthen, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(3), 399-420.
31. National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). School district data book reference manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
32. National Center for Education Statistics. (1995a). Disparities in public school district spending 1989-90. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
33. National Center for Education Statistics. (1995b). Public school teacher cost differences across the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Assessment and analysis of school-level expenditures (Working Paper No. 96-19). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 3-34.
37. Odden, A., & Clune, W. (1995). Improving educational productivity and school finance. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 6-10, 22.
38. Odden, A., Monk, D., Nakib, Y., & Picus, L. (1995). The story of the education dollar: No academy awards and no fiscal smoking guns. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(October), 161-168.
39. Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4), 307-355.
40. Spade, J. Z., Columba, L., & Vanfossen, B. E. (1997). Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course selection procedures. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 108-127.
41. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995). School finance: Trends in U.S. spending. Washington, DC: Author.
42. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). State efforts to reduce funding gaps between poor and wealth districts. Washington, DC: Author.
43. Wenglinsky, H. H. (1997a). How money matters: Models of the effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(3), 221-237.
44. Wenglinsky, H. H. (1997b). When money matters: How educational expenditures improve student performance and how they don't. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.