Inter-session-processes: A neglected area of psychotherapy research inter-session-prozesse;Inter-Session-Prozesse: Ein vernachlässigtes Thema der Psychotherapieforschung

PPmP Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 236-242

  Zeeck, Almut ^a   Hartmann, Armin ^a   Orlinsky, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Generic Model; Inter session process; Process; Psychotherapy research; Representation

Indexed keywords

EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

EID: 3042532445     PISSN: 09372032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-814790     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Lambert MJ (ed). Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (5. Auflage). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004
2. Orlinsky DE, Geller JD. Patients representations of their therapists and therapy: new measures. In: Miller NE, Docherty JP, Luborsky L, Barber JP (eds): Psychodynamic Treatment Research. New York: Basic Books, 1993: 423-466
3. Orlinsky DE, Geller JD, Tarragona M, Farber B. Patients representations of psychotherapy: a new focus for psychodynamic research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61 (4): 596-610
4. Fonagy P. Die Bedeutung der Entwicklung metakognitiver Kontrolle der mentalen Repräsentanzen für die Betreuung und das Wachstum des Kindes. Psyche 1998; 52 (4): 349-368
5. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss (Vol. 1): Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 1969
6. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss (Vol. 2): Separation. New York: Basic Books, 1973
7. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss (Vol. 3): Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books, 1980
8. Bowlby J. A secure base - clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Tavistock/Routledge, 1988
9. Kernberg O. Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson, 1976
10. Bretherton I. Communication patterns, internal working models and the intergenerational transmission of attachment relationships. Infant Ment Health J 1990; 11 (3): 237-251
11. Main & Kaplan. Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. In: Bretherton I, Waters E (eds): Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1985; No. 209, Vol. 50: Nos. 1-2
12. Bion WR. Lernen durch Erfahrung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1990 (Übersetzung von E. Krejci, Original: 1962)
13. Kohut H. The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1971
14. Schafer R. Aspects of internalization. New York: International Universities Press, 1968
15. Connolly MB, Crits-Christoph P, Barber JP, Luborsky L. Transference patterns in the therapeutic relationship in supportive expressive psychotherapy for depression. Psychotherapy Research 2000; 10 (3): 356-372
16. Buchheim A, Mergenthaler E. The relationship among attachment representation, emotion-abstraction patterns and narrative style: a computer based text analysis of the adult attachment interview. Psychotherapy Research 2000; 10 (4): 390-407
17. Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P. Understanding transference: the CCRT method. New York: Basic Books, 1990
18. Connolly MB, Demorest A, Azarian K et al. Varieties of transference patterns in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996; 64 (4): 1213-1221
19. Grawe K. Schema-Theorie und Heuristische Psychotherapie. Forschungsbericht 2/1986, 2. Auflage. Bern: Universität Bern: Psychologisches Institut, 1987
20. Orlinsky DE, Howard KI. A generic model of psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy 1987; 6 (1): 6-27
21. Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH, Willutzki U. Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research. In: Lambert MJ (ed): Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (5. Auflage). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004: 307-389
22. Geller JD, Cooley RS, Hartley D. Images of the psychotherapist: a theoretical and methodological perspective. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 1981; 1: 123-146
23. Hartmann A. Therapie zwischen den Stunden. Exploration von Inter-Session-Prozessen. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1997
24. Hartmann A, Orlinski D, Geller JD, Zeeck A. Der Inter-Session-Fragebogen - ein Instrument zur Erfassung von psychotherapierelevanten Prozessen zwischen den Sitzungen. Psychother Psych Med 2003; 53: 464-468
25. Zeeck A, Hartmann A, Balke K, Kuhn K. Inter-Session-Prozesse: quantitative und qualitative Daten aus dem Bereich teilstationärer Psychotherapie. Psychother Psych Med, (Manuskript in Vorbereitung)
26. Orlinsky DE, Tarragona M. Patients representations of the therapist and experiences in therapy sessions: futher findings. Toronto, Canada: Vortrag auf der 20. Jahrestagung der Society for Psychotherapy Resaerch, 1989
27. Epstein M. Mental representations of the therapeutic relationship during the post-termination period. Chicago: Dept. of Psychology, University of Chicago, 1989
28. Farber & Geller. The relationship of therapist-patient gender pairings to representation and outcome in psychotherapy. Toronto, Canada: Vortrag auf der 20. Jahrestagung der Society for Psychotherapy Research, 1989
29. Knox S, Goldberg JL, Woodhouse SS, Hill C. Client' internal representations of their therapists. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1999; 46 (2): 244-256
30. Barchat D. Representations and reparations in therapy: the august phenomenon. Toronto, Canada: Vortrag auf der 20. Jahrestagung der Society for Psychotherapy Research, 1989
31. Wzontek N, Geller JD, Farber BA. Patients posttermination representation of their psychotherapists. J Am Acad Psychoanal 1995; 23: 395-410
32. Zeeck A, Hartmann A. Intersession experiences of patients in a psychotherapeutic day clinic: differences between patients with or without a personality disorder. Weimar/Deutschland: Vortrag auf der Tagung der Society for Psychotherapy Research, 2003
33. Hartmann A, Zeeck A. Relationships between patients evaluations of sessions and intersession experiences: explorations of processes comparing patients with or without a personality disorder. Weimar/Deutschland: Vortag auf der Tagung der Society for Psychotherapy Research, 2003
34. Bender DS, Farber BA, Sanislow CA, Dyck IR, Geller JD, Skodol AE. Representations of therapists by patients with personality disorders. J American Journal of Psychotherapy 2003; 57: 219-236
35. Montgomery SH. The unfolding of representations of the therapy relationship: internalization in the supervisory relationship. Santa Fe, USA: Vortrag auf der 19. Jahrestagung der Society for Psychotherapy Research, 1988
36. Honig J. The effect of level of object representations on patients' internalized representations of their therapists during the beginning phase of treatment. Dissertation. Dept. of Clincal Psychology, Teachers College: Columbia University, 1989
37. Tarragona M. Patients experience of psychotherapy between sessions: their relations to some input, process and output variables of Psychotherapy. Chicago: Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 1989
38. Rosenzweig DL, Farber BA. Clients representations of their therapists over the course of psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol 1996; 52 (2): 197-207
39. Geller JD, Farber BA. Factors influencing the process of internalization in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research 1993; 3 (3): 166-180
40. Neimeyer RA, Feixas G. The role of homework and skill aquisitation in the outcome of group cognitive therapy for depression. Behavior Therapy 1990; 21: 281-292