Clinical evaluation of an anterior hybrid composite resin over 8 years

British Dental Journal

Volumn 182, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 26-30

  Millar, B J ^a   Robinson, P B ^a   Inglis, A T ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYURETHANES; PROSTHESIS COLORING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031564370     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809289     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. van Dijken J W V. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A 6-year follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 357-367.
2. Raptis C, Fan P L, Powers J M. Properties of microfilled and visible light-cured composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 99: 1-333.
3. Cvar J F, Ryge C. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. Washington DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1971.
4. Smales R J, Gerke D C. Clinical evaluation of four anterior composite resins over 5 years. Dent Materials 1992; 8: 246-251.
5. Smales R J. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1991; 16: 202-209.
6. van Noort R, Davis L G. A prospective study of the survival of chemically activated anterior resin composite restorations in general dental practice: 5-year results. J Dent 1993; 21: 209-215.
7. Phillips R W, Avery D R, Mehra R, Swartz M L, McCune R J. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: three-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 891-897.
8. Wendt S L, Leinfelder K F. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 207-211.
9. Smales R J, Webster D A, Leppard P I. Survival predictions of four types of dental restorative materials J Dent 1991; 19: 278-282.
10. Smales R J. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 130-133.
11. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989; 17: S10-17.
12. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjor I A. Placement and longevity of tooth-coloured restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305-311.
13. Pieper K, Meyer G, Marienhagen B, Motsch A. Eine Langzeitstudie an Amalgam und Kunststoff-Fullungen. Deutsche Zahnarztl Z 1991; 46: 222-225.
14. Qvist V, Strom C. Eleven-year assessment of Class-III resin restorations completed with two restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scan 1993; 51: 253-262.
15. Wilder A D, May K N, Leinfelder KF. Eight-year clinical study of UV-polymerized composite resins in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1987; 66: abstract 481
16. Mjor I A, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 82-85.