No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints

Psychological Research

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 52-58

  Koning, Arno ^a   Van Lier, Rob ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 30344481125     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0191-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bar, M. (2001) Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 793-799.
2. Barlow, H. B., & Reeves, B. C. (1979). The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Research, 19, 783-793.
3. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1994). Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes. Visual Cognition, 1, 377-400.
4. Jolicoeur, P., Corballis, M., & Lawson, R. (1998). The influence of perceived rotary motion on the recognition of objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 140-146.
5. Kahn, J. I., & Foster, D. H. (1986). Horizontal-vertical structure in the visual comparison of rigidly transformed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 422-433.
6. Large, M., McMullen, P. A., & Hamm, J. P. (2003). The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1-19.
7. Lawson, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
8. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). View-specific effects of depth rotations and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1052-1066.
9. Mach, E. (1886). Beiträge zur Analyze der Empfindungen. Jena, Germany: Fisher.
10. McMullen, P. A., & Farah, M. J. (1991). Viewer-centered and object-centered representations in the recognition of naturalistic line drawings. Psychological Science, 2, 275-277.
11. Palmer, S. E., & Hemenway, K. (1978). Orientation and symmetry: Effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 691-702.
12. Palmer, S. E., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Rock, I., & Leaman, R. (1963). An experimental analysis of visual symmetry. Acta Psychologica, 21, 171-183.
14. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychological Science, 1, 253-256.
15. Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
16. Van der Helm, P. A., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1996). Goodness of visual regularities: A nontransformational approach. Psychological Review, 103, 429-456.
17. Van Lier, R. J., & Wagemans, J. (1999). From images to objects: Global and local completions of self-occluded parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1721-1741.
18. Verfaillie, K., & Boutsen, L. (1995). A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 925-961.
19. Vetter, T., & Poggio, T. (1994). Symmetric 3D objects are an easy case for 2D object recognition. Spatial Vision, 8, 443-453.
20. Wagemans, J. (1995). Detection of visual symmetries. Spatial Vision, 9, 9-32.
21. Wenderoth, P. (1995). The role of pattern outline in bilateral symmetry detection with briefly flashed dot patterns. Spatial Vision, 9, 57-77.
22. Willems, B., & Wagemans, J. (2001). Matching multicomponent objects from different viewpoints: Mental rotation as normalization? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1090-1115.
23. Wilson, K. D., & Farah, M. J. (2003). When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition? Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 399-415.