Global analysis of factors affecting the outcome of freshwater fish introductions

Conservation Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1883-1893

  Ruesink, Jennifer L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Establishment; Introduced species; Invasion; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; ICHTHYOFAUNA; RISK ASSESSMENT;

PISCES;

EID: 30344476083     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00267.x-i1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Beirne, B. 1975. Biological control attempts by introductions against pest insects in the field in Canada. Canadian Entomologist 107:225-236.
2. Blackburn, T. M., and R. P. Duncan. 2001. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414:195-197.
3. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528-534.
5. Duncan, R. P. 1997. The role of competition and introduction effort in the success of passeriform birds introduced to New Zealand. The American Naturalist 149:903-915.
6. Duncan, R. P., M. Bomford, D. M. Forsyth, and L. Conibear. 2001. High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:621-632.
7. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125:1-15.
9. Foin, T. C., S. P. D. Riley, A. L. Pawley, D. R. Ayres, T. M. Carlsen, P. J. Hodum, and P. V. Switzer. 1998. Improving recovery planning for threatened and endangered species. BioScience 48:177-184.
10. Forsyth, D. M., R. P. Duncan, M. Bomford, and G. Moore. 2004. Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conservation Biology 18:557-569.
11. Froese, R., and D. Pauly, editors. 1998. FishBase 98: concepts, design and data sources. International Center for Living Aquatic Resource Management, Manila.
12. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:199-204.
13. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233-1236.
14. Lee, C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:386-391.
15. Levine, J. M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 2002. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15-26.
16. Lockwood, J. L. 1999. Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: relative importance of transport and establishment. Conservation Biology 13:560-567.
17. Lodge, D. M. 1993. Species invasions and deletions: community effects and responses to climate and habitat change. Pages 367-387 in P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, editors. Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
18. Marchetti, M. P., P. B. Moyle, and R. Levine. 2004. Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecological Applications 14:587-596.
19. McKinney, C. L. 2001. Effects of human population, area, and time on non-native plant and fish diversity in the United States. Biological Conservation 100:243-252.
20. Moulton, M. P. 1993. The all-or-none pattern in introduced Hawaiian passeriforms: the role of competition sustained. The American Naturalist 141:105-119.
21. Moyle, P. B. 1986. Fish introductions into North America: patterns and ecological impact. Pages 27-43 in H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake, editors. Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York.
22. Moyle, P. B., and J. E. Williams. 1990. Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone: decline of the native fish fauna of California. Conservation Biology 4:275-284.
23. National Invasive Species Council (NISC). 2001. National management plan: meeting the invasive species challenge. January 18, 2001. NISC, Washington, D.C. Available from http://www.invasivespecies.gov/ council/nmptoc.shtml (accessed October 2004).
24. Olden, J. D., N. L. Poff, M. R. Douglas, M. E. Douglas, and K. D. Fausch. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:18-24.
25. Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
26. Pimentel, D., editor. 2002. Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
27. Rahel, F. J. 2000. Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 288:854-856.
28. Rahel, F. J. 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 33:291-315.
29. Rejmanek, M., and D. M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655-1661.
30. Reichard, S. H., and C. W. Hamilton. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11:193-203.
31. Ruesink, J. L. 2003. One fish, two fish, old fish, new fish: Which invasions matter? Pages 161-178 in P. Kareiva and S. A. Levin, editors. The importance of species: perspectives on expendability and triage. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
32. Ruesink, J. L., I. M. Parker, M. J. Groom, and P. M. Kareiva. 1995. Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introductions. BioScience 45:465-477.
33. Savage, V. M., J. F. Gillooly, J. H. Brown, G. B. West, and E. L. Charnov. 2004. Effects of body size and temperature on population size. The American Naturalist 163:429-441.
34. Semmens, B. X., E. R. Buhle, A. K. Salomon, and C. V. Pattengill-Semmens. 2004. A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway. Marine Ecology Progress Series 266:239-244.
35. Shea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:170-176.
36. Simberloff, D. 1986. Introduced insects: a biogeographic and systematic perspective. Pages 3-26 in H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake, editors. Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Spring-Verlag, New York.
37. Trexler, J. C., and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74:1629-1637.
38. Urban, D. L. 2002. Classification and regression trees. Pages 222-232 in B. McCune and J. B. Grace, editors. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
39. Veltman, C. J., S. Nee, and M. J. Crawley 1996. Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. The American Naturalist 147:542-557.
40. Welcomme, R. L. 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. Fisheries technical paper 294. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
41. Wilcove, D. S., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Loses. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607-615.
42. Wolf, C. M., T. Garland, and B. Griffith. 1998. Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation 86:243-255.
43. Wonham, M. J., J. T. Carlton, G. M. Ruiz, and L. D. Smith. 2000. Fish and ships: relating dispersal frequency to success in biological invasions. Marine Biology 136:1111-1121.