A genome-wide linkage and association study using COGA data

BMC Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL.1, 2005, Pages

  Zhu, Xiaofeng ^a   Cooper, Richard ^a   Kan, Donghui ^a   Cao, Guichan ^a   Wu, Xiaodong ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CHROMOSOME 3; CHROMOSOME 7; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOGENESIS; SAMPLE SIZE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; COOPERATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALCOHOLISM; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DATABASES, GENETIC; FAMILY; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); LOD SCORE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 30344452491     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S128     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996, 273:1516-1517.
2. Whittemore AS, Halpern J: A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. Biometrics 1994, 50:118-127.
3. Sengul H, Weeks DE, Feingold E: A survey of affected-sibship statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 69:179-190.
4. Kong A, Cox NJ: Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 61:1179-1188.
5. Horvath S, Xu X, Laird NM: The family based association test method: strategies for studying general genotype-phenotype associations. Eur J Hum Genet 2001, 9:301-306.
6. Lake S, Blacker, Laird N: Family based tests in the presence of association. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 67:1515-1525.
7. Sullivan PF, Neale BM, Neale MC, van den Cord E, Kendler KS: Multipoint and single point non-parametric linkage analysis with imperfect data. Am J Med Genet 2003, 12113:89-94.
8. Foroud T, Edenberg HJ, Goate A, Rice J, Flury L, Koller DL, Bierut LJ, Conneally PM, Numberger JI, Bucholz KK, Li TK, Hesselbrock V, Crowe R, Schuckit M, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Reich T. Alcoholism susceptibility loci: Confirmation studies in a replicate sample and further mapping. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000, 24:933-945.
9. Huang Q, Shete S, Amos CI: Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 75:1106-1112.
10. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA: Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:106-120.
11. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, Higgins J, DeFelice M, Lochner A, Faggart M, Liu-Cordero SN, Rotimi C, Adeyemo A, Cooper R, Ward R, Lander ES, Daly MJ, Altshuler D: The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 2002, 296:2225-2229.