The electronic ball and chain? The operation and impact of Home Detention with electronic monitoring in New Zealand

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-17

  Gibbs, Anita ^a   King, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30244561000     PISSN: 00048658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/acri.36.1.1     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Aungles, A. (1995). Three bedroomed prisons in the Asia Pacific Region: Home imprisonment and electronic surveillance in Australia, Hawaii, and Singapore. Just Policy, March, 32-37.
2. Ball, R.A., & Lilly, J.R. (1986). A theoretical explanation of home incarceration. Federal Probation, 50, 17-24.
3. Bishop, N. (1996). Intensive supervision with electronic monitoring: A Swedish alternative to imprisonment. Vista: Perspectives on Probation, 1, 23-30.
4. Bonta, J. (1999). The electronic monitoring of offenders research summary. Canada: Department of the Solicitor General.
5. Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (1999). Electronic monitoring in Canada. Canada: Solicitor General Canada, Public Works and Government Services.
6. Church, A., & Dunstan, S. (1997). Home detention: The Evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Program 1995-1997. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
7. Dodgson, K., & Mortimer, E. (2000). Home Detention Curfew - The first year of operation. Research Findings 110. UK: Home Office.
8. Dodgson, K., Mortimer, E., & Sugg, D. (2000). Assessing prisoners for Home Detention Curfew: A guide for practitioners. UK: Home Office.
9. Dodgson, K., Goodwin, P., Howard, P., Llewellyn-Thomas, S., Mortimer, E., Russell, N., & Weiner, M. (2001). Electronic monitoring of released prisoners: An evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Home Office Research Study 222 UK: Home Office.
10. Doherty, D. (1995). Impressions of the Impact of the Electronic Monitoring Program on the Family. In K. Schulz (Ed.), Electronic monitoring and corrections: The policy, the operation, the research. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
11. Enos, R., Holman, J.E., & Caroll, M.E. (1992). Alternative sentencing. US: Wyndhamhall.
12. Fox, R.G. (1987). Dr Schwitzgebel's Machine revisited: Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20, 131-147.
13. Garland, D. (1996). The limits of the sovereign state. The British Journal of Criminology, 36, 445-471.
14. Gainey, R.R., & Payne, B.K. (2000). Understanding the experience of house arrest with electronic monitoring: An analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 84-96.
15. Gibbs, A., & King, D. (2001). The electronic ball and chain? The development, operation and impact of home detention in New Zealand. Dunedin: Community and Family Studies, University of Otago.
16. Gibbs, A., & King, D. (2002). Alternatives to custody in the New Zealand criminal justice system: Current features and future prospects. Social Policy and Administration, 36, 392-407.
17. Heggie, K. (1999). Review of the NSW Home Detention Scheme. NSW: Department of Corrective Services.
18. Keay, N. (2000). Home detention - An alternative to prison? Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 12, 98-105.
19. Liverani, R.M. (1998). Slow take-up for home detention: Magistrates cool, many lawyers unaware of the option. Law Society Journal, February, 42-48.
20. Lilly, J.R (1992). Electronic monitoring - Another fatal remedy? In C.A. Hartjen & E.E. Rhine (Eds.), Correctional theory and practice. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
21. Lilly, J.R., Ball, R.A., Curry, G.D., & McMullen, J. (1993). Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 462-484.
22. Lilly, R., & Nellis, M., (2001). Home Detention Curfew and the future of electronic monitoring. Prison Service Journal, May, 59-69.
23. Mainprize, S. (1992). Electronic monitoring in corrections: Assessing cost effectiveness and the potential for widening the net of social control. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34, 161-180.
24. Mainprize, S. (1995). Social, psychological, and familial impacts of home confinement and electronic monitoring: Exploratory research findings from B.C.'s Pilot Project. In K. Schulz (Ed.), Electronic monitoring and corrections: The policy, the operation, the research. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
25. Moore, D., & Haggarty, K. (2001). Bring it on home: Home drug testing and the relocation of the war on drugs. Social and Legal Studies, 10, 377-395.
26. Mortimer, E., & Mair, G. (1997). Curfew orders with electronic monitoring: The first twelve months. Research Findings No.51. UK: Home Office.
27. Mortimer, E. (2001). Electronic monitoring of released prisoners: An evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Research Findings No. 139. UK: Home Office.
28. Nellis, M. (2000). Law and order: The electronic monitoring of offenders. In D.P. Dolowitz (Ed.) Policy transfer and British social policy: Learning from the USA? Philadelphia: OUP.
29. Payne, B.K., & Gainey, R.R., (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 49-163.
30. Payne, B.K., & Gainey, R.R., (2000). Electronic monitoring: Philosophical, systemic, and political Issues. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 93-111.
31. Pratt, J. (2000). The return of the wheelbarrow men; or, the arrival of postmodern Penality? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 127-145.
32. Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321-339.
33. Schultz, K. (Ed.). (1995) Electronic monitoring and corrections: The policy, the operation, the research. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
34. Smith, D. (2001). Electronic monitoring of offenders: The Scottish experience. Criminal Justice, 1, 201-214.
35. Spier, P. (2001). Conviction and sentencing of offenders in New Zealand: 1991-2000. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
36. Sugg, D., Moore, L., & Howard, P. (2001). Electronic monitoring and offending behaviour - Reconviction results for the second year of trials of curfew orders. Research Findings No. 141. UK: Home Office.
37. Walter, I., Sugg, D., & Moore, L. (2001). A year on the tag: Interviews with criminal justice practitioners and electronic monitoring staff about curfew orders. Research Findings No. 140. UK: Home Office.
38. Whitfield, D. (1997). Tackling the tag: The electronic monitoring of offenders. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.
39. Whitfield, D. (2001). The magic bracelet: Technology and offender supervision. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.