Proportions, Odds, and Risk

Radiology

Volumn 230, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 12-19

  Sistrom, Christopher L ^a   Garvan, Cynthia W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ODDS RATIO; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK;

EID: 0346218110     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2301031028     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Langlotz CP. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology 2003; 228:3-9.
2. Applegate KE, Tello R, Ying J. Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians. Radiology 2003; 228:603-608.
3. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:618-626.
4. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:279-283.
5. Motulsky H. Intuitive biostatistics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1995.
6. Riegelman RK. Studying a study and testing a test. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
7. Sackett DL. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, 1991.
8. Medina LS, Zurakowski D. Measurement variability and confidence intervals in medicine: why should radiologists care? Radiology 2003; 226:297-301.
9. Cogo A, Bernardi E, Prandoni P, et al. Acquired risk factors for deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:164-168.
10. Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Wu FF, Brandt KR. Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11:1382-1388.
11. Burman ML, Taplin SH, Herta DF, Elmore JG. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131:1-6.
12. Harrison RV, Janz NK, Wolfe RA, et al. Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial. Med Care 2003; 41:375-385.
13. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003.
14. Cochran WG. Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics 1954; 10:417-451.
15. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22:719-748.
16. Simpson EH. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc B 1951; 13:238-241.
17. Radelet ML, Pierce GL. Choosing those who will die: race and the death penalty in Florida. Florida Law Rev 1991; 43:1-34.