An extension of the Williams trend test to general unbalanced linear models

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1735-1748

  Bretz, Frank ^a  

^a NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Linear models; Modified Williams test; Multivariate t distribution; Order restriction; Trend test

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL TESTS; THEOREM PROVING;

LINEAR MODELS; MODIFIED WILLIAMS TEST; MULTIVARIATE DISTRIBUTION; ORDER RESTRICTION; TREND TESTS;

LINEARIZATION;

EID: 30144434028     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2005.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. H. Banno, and A. Yamagami Food consumption and conversion efficiency of the larvae of Eupromus ruber (Dalman) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Appl. Entomol. Zool. 24 1989 174 179
2. D.J. Bartholomew Ordered tests in the analysis of variance Biometrika 48 1961 325 332
3. F. Bretz, and L.A. Hothorn Asymptotic power and sample size determination for contrast tests with binomial data Statist. Med. 21 2002 3325 3335
4. F. Bretz, and D. Seidel SAS/IML programs for exact calculations of orthant probabilities for arbitrary dimensions Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 33 2000 220 221
5. D.R. Cox The role of significance tests Scand. J. Statist. 4 1977 49 62
6. A. Genz, and F. Bretz Methods for the computation of multivariate t -probabilities J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 11 2002 950 971
7. L.A. Hothorn Robustness study on Williams and Shirley procedure, with application in toxicology Biometrical J. 31 1989 891 903
8. L.A. Hothorn, and F. Bretz Evaluation of animal carcinogenicity studies: Cochran- Armitage trend test vs. multiple contrast tests Biometrical J. 42 2000 553 567
9. L.A. Hothorn, M. Neuhäuser, and H.F. Koch Analysis of randomized dose-finding-studies: closure test modifications based on multiple contrast tests Biometrical J. 39 1997 467 479
10. S. Kotz, and S. Nadarajah Multivariate t Distributions and their Applications 2004 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
11. S. Kuriki, H. Shimodaira, and A.J. Hayter On the isotonic range statistic for testing against an ordered alternative J. Statist. Plann. Inference 105 2002 347 362
12. R. Marcus The power of some tests of the equality of normal means against an ordered alternative Biometrika 63 1976 177 183
13. T. Robertson, F.T. Wright, and R.L. Dykstra Order Restricted Statistical Inference 1988 Wiley New York
14. S.J. Ruberg Contrast for identifying the minimum effective dose J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84 1989 816 822
15. S.J. Ruberg Dose response studies II. Analysis and interpretation J. Biopharm. Statist. 5 1995 15 42
16. E.A. Shirley A nonparametric equivalent of Williams' test for contrasting increasing dose levels of a treatment Biometrics 33 1977 386 389
17. D.J. Spiegelhalter, K.A. Abrams, and J.P. Myles Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation 2004 Wiley New York
18. W.H. Stewart, and S.J. Ruberg Detecting dose response with contrasts Statist. Med. 19 2000 913 921
19. A.C. Tamhane, C.W. Dunnett, and Y. Hochberg Multiple test procedures for dose finding Biometrics 52 1996 21 37
20. K.T. Tsai, and R.D. Chen Robust Williams trend test Commun. Statist. Theory Methods 29 2000 1327 1346
21. P.H. Westfall, R.D. Tobias, D. Rom, R.D. Wolfinger, and Y. Hochberg Multiple comparisons and multiple testing using the SAS System 1999 SAS Institute Inc Cary
22. P.H. Westfall, and S.S. Young Resampling-Based Multiple Testing 1993 Wiley New York
23. D.A. Williams The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control Biometrics 28 1972 519 531
24. D.A. Williams A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control Biometrics 27 1971 103 117 Correction: 31, 1019
25. D.A. Williams A note on Shirley's non-parametric test for comparing several dose levels with a zero-dose control Biometrics 42 1986 183 186
26. D.A. Williams Tests for differences between several small proportions Appl. Statist. 37 1988 421 434
27. I. Yoshimura, A. Wakana, and C. Hamada A performance comparison of maximum contrast methods to detect dose dependency Drug Inform. J. 30 1997 423 432