A performance comparison of maximum contrast methods to detect dose dependency

Drug Information Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 423-432

  Yoshimura, Isao ^a   Wakana, Akira ^a   Hamada, Chikuma ^b  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contrast; Max t method; Minimum toxic dose; One way layout; Williams method

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOUND;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOSE CALCULATION; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 0031009874     PISSN: 00928615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009286159703100213     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Scheffé H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika. 1953;40:87-104.
2. Robertson T, Wright FT, Dykstra RL. Order restricted statistical inference. New York: John-Wiley Sons; 1988.
3. Ruberg SJ. Contrasts for identifying the minimum effective dose. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:816-822.
4. Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096-1121.
5. Williams DA. A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics. 1971;27:103-117.
6. Williams DA. The comparison of several dose levels with a dose zero control. Biometrics. 1972;28:661-670.
7. Tamhane AC, Hochberg Y, Dunnett CW. Multiple test procedures for dose-finding. Biometrics. 1996;52:21-33.
8. Hirotsu C. The cumulative Chi-squares method and a studentized maximal contrast method for testing an ordered alternative in a one-way analysis of variance model. Rep Stat Appl Rse JUSE. 1979;26:12-21.
9. Kuriki S, Hirotsu C, Hayter JH. The multiple comparison procedure based on the maximal component of the cumulative Chi-squared statistic - Calculation of significance probability and its application to the comparison of dose levels. (In Japanese.) Jpn J Appl Stat. 1989;18:129-141.
10. Marcus R. The powers of some tests of the equality of normal means against an ordered alternative. Biometrika. 1976;63:177-183,
11. Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika. 1976;63:655-660.
12. Kishimoto J. MULTTEST, a procedure to obtain multiplicity adjusted p-value based on resampling. (In Japanese.) Bull Comp Stat Jpn. 1992;5:157-160.
13. Hamada C, Kishimoto J. Application of SAS/MULTTEST to biostatistical data. (In Japanese.) Bull Comp Stat Jpn. 1994;7:91-96.