What will be needed for the new gastroenterology fellowship match to succeed?

Gastroenterology

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 218-224

  Niederle, Muriel ^a,b   Proctor, Deborah D ^c   Roth, Alvin E ^d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GASTROENTEROLOGY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STUDENT RETENTION;

EID: 30044451771     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.058     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Proctor DD. AGA task force recommends reinstating the national GI fellowship match. 2005. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/wmspage.cfm?parm1= 329. Accessed on July 7, 2005.
2. Gastroenterology fellowship match. GI will rejoin the match in 2006. 2005. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/wmspage.cfm?parm1=989. Accessed on July 7, 2005.
3. A.E. Roth The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents a case study in game theory J Political Economy 92 1984 991 1016
4. A.E. Roth The origins, history, and design of the resident match JAMA 289 2003 909 912
5. Gerson L. To match or not to match in gastroenterology: an interview with David Brenner, MD, Chair of AGA's Manpower and Training Committee. AGA Trainee & Young GI News, Spring 1999, Volume 5, Number 1. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/trainee/trainee6.html. Accessed Spring 2003.
6. W.T. Bauer, W. Fackler, K. Kongara, C. Matteoni, B. Shen, M. Vaezi Comment to it's time to bring the best and brightest back to gastroenterology Gastroenterology 116 1999 1014
7. C.N. McKinney, M. Niederle, A.E. Roth The collapse of a medical labor clearinghouse (and why such failures are rare) Am Econ Rev 95 2005 878 889
8. F.S. Gorelick Striking up the match Gastroenterology 117 1999 295
9. R.A. Liddle The best and the brightest Gastroenterology 122 2002 851 852
10. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth Market culture how norms governing exploding offers affect market performance. 2004 NBER working paper, February
11. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth The gastroenterology fellowship match how it failed, and why it could succeed once again Gastroenterology 127 2004 658 666
12. J.K. Lim, S.B. Shah Restoring a gastroenterology fellowship match a trainee perspective Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1412 1414
13. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth Unraveling reduces mobility in a labor market gastroenterology with and without a centralized match J Political Economy 111 2003 1342 1352
14. E. Achkar Balancing view. The GI match: what is in the balance? Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 9
15. M.N. Ehrinpreis Con: the gastroenterology fellowship match: R.I.P Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 7
16. J.E. Richter Pro: gastroenterology match: good for all the players Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 6
17. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth Re-starting the gastroenterology match Am J Gastroenterol 100 2005 1202 1203
18. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth The gastroenterology fellowship market should there be a match? Am Econ Rev Papers and Proceedings 95 2005 372 375
19. Jung, et al. v. Ass'n of Am. Med. C., et al., Class Action Complaint, No. 02-CV-00873 (D.D.C. May 5, 2002).
20. Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004, Public Law No. 108-218. Available at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname= 108_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ218.108.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2005.
21. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth Relationship between wages and presence of a match in medical fellowships JAMA 290 2003 1153 1154
22. M. Niederle, A.E. Roth Effect of a match on salaries for medical fellows-reply JAMA 290 2003 2408
23. Paul Jung, MD v. Association of American Medical Colleges, Civil Action No. 02-873, Opinion, Order & Judgment issued August 12, 2004, by Judge Paul L. Friedman. Available at: http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/02-873a.pdf. Accessed on November 17, 2005.
24. A.E. Roth, X. Xing Jumping the gun imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions Am Econ Rev 84 1994 992 1044
25. N. Talley, J.E. Richter, E. Achkar Editors' comments Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1411
26. D.S. Pardi Should the national GI fellowship matching program be restored? Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1411 1412
27. A.E. Roth, E. Peranson The redesign of the matching market for American physicians some engineering aspects of economic design Am Econ Rev 89 1999 748 780
28. Council of Graduate Schools. Resolution Regarding Graduate Scholars, Fellows, Trainees, and Assistants. Available at: http://www.cgsnet.org/ PublicationsPolicyRes/resolutions.htm. Accessed November 17, 2005.
29. A.E. Roth, E. Peranson The effects of the change in the NRMP matching algorithm JAMA 278 1997 729 732
30. A guide for GI fellowship programs. How the match will work for gastroenterology. 2005. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/user-assets/ Documents/Match/factsheet_training_programs.pdf. Accessed on July 7, 2005.