The effect of genotype, environment and time of harvest on sugarcane yields in Florida, USA

Field Crops Research

Volumn 95, Issue 2-3, 2006, Pages 156-170

  Gilbert, R A ^a   Shine Jr , J M ^b   Miller, J D ^c   Rice, R W ^b   Rainbolt, C R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Sugar Cane Growers Coop of Florida   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Environment; Genotype; Sugarcane; Time of harvest

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; HARVESTING; SUGAR CANE;

BREEDING PROGRAMS; GENOTYPE; TIME OF HARVEST;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CROP YIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; GENOTYPE; SUGAR CANE;

BREEDING; ENVIRONMENTS; HARVESTING; PLANTS; SUGAR CANE; VARIETIES;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

SACCHARUM; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 30044432972     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J.A. Alvarez, D.R. Crane, T.H. Spreen, and G. Kidder A yield prediction model for Florida sugarcane Agric. Syst. 9 1982 161 179
2. D.L. Anderson, H.G. de Boer, and K.M. Portier Identification of nutritional and environmental factors affecting sugarcane production in Barbados Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 26 1995 2887 2901
3. G. Arceneaux, and L.P. Hebert A statistical analysis of varietal yields of sugarcane obtained over a period of years Agron. J. 35 1943 148 160
4. D. Bissessur, R.A.E. Tilney-Bassett, L.C.Y. Lim Shin Chong, R. Domaingue, and M.H.R. Julien Family × environment and genotype × environment interactions for sugarcane across two contrasting marginal environments in Mauritius Exp. Agric. 36 2000 101 114
5. G.D. Bonnett Rate of leaf appearance in sugarcane, including a comparison of a range of varieties Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25 1998 829 834
6. A.B. Bottcher, and F.T. Izuno Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA): Water, Soil, Crop and Environmental Management 1994 University Press of Florida Gainesville, FL
7. B.A. Bourne Significant developments in the early phases of the Florida cane sugar industry Sugar Azucar 67 1972 19 23
8. J.S. Brown, and B. Glaz Analysis of resource allocation in final stage sugarcane cultivar selection Crop Sci. 41 2001 57 62
9. J.K. Bull, D.M. Hogarth, and K.E. Basford Impact of genotype × environment interaction on response to selection in sugarcane Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 32 1992 731 737
10. Y.S. Chang Estimating heritability of and correlations among brix, purity, and sugar content in sugarcane using balanced multiple environment and year data Taiwan Sugar Res. Inst. Rep. 151 1996 1 10
11. M.C. Cox, D.R. Ridge, and B. Hussey Optimum time of harvest for high early CCS sugar varieties Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 20 1998 218 223
12. C.W. Deren, J. Alvarez, and B. Glaz Use of economic criteria for selecting clones in a sugarcane breeding program Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 21 1995 437 447
13. O. De Sousa-Vieira, and S.B. Milligan Intrarow plant spacing and family × environment interaction effects on sugarcane family evaluation Crop Sci. 39 1999 358 364
14. S.J. Edme, J.D. Miller, B. Glaz, P.Y.P. Tai, and J.C. Comstock Genetic contributions to yield gains in the Florida sugarcane industry across 33 years Crop Sci. 45 2005 92 97
15. R.N. Ellis, K.E. Basford, M. Cooper, J.K. Leslie, and D.E. Blyth A methodology for analysis of sugarcane productivity trends. I. Analysis across districts Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52 2001 1001 1009
16. R.N. Ellis, K.E. Basford, J.K. Leslie, D.M. Hogarth, and M. Cooper A methodology for analysis of sugarcane productivity trends. 2. Comparing variety trials with commercial productivity Aust. J. Agric. Res. 55 2004 109 116
17. Gilbert, R.A., Shine Jr., J.M., Miller, J.D., Rice, R.W., 2004. Sucrose accumulation and harvest schedule recommendations for CP sugarcane cultivars. Online. Crop Management. doi: 10.1094/CM-2004-0402-01-RS.
18. B. Glaz, and J. Vonderwell Sugarcane variety census: Florida 2003 Sugar J. 67 2004 11 19
19. B. Glaz, J.D. Miller, and M.S. Kang Evaluation of cultivar-testing environments in sugarcane Theor. Appl. Genet. 71 1985 22 25
20. K.A. Gravois, and S.B. Milligan Genetic relationships between fiber and sugarcane yield components Crop Sci. 32 1992 62 67
21. N.G. Inman-Bamber Temperature and seasonal effects on canopy development and light interception of sugarcane Field Crops Res. 36 1994 41 51
22. P.A. Jackson, and T.A. McRae Gains from selection of broadly adapted and specifically adapted sugarcane families Field Crops Res. 59 1998 151 162
23. M.H.R. Julien, and P. Delaveau The effects of time of harvest on the partitioning of dry matter in three sugarcane varieties grown in contrasting environments Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 16 1977 1755 1769
24. M.S. Kang, and J.D. Miller Genotype × environment interactions for cane and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding Crop Sci. 24 1984 435 440
25. C.A. Kimbeng, A.R. Rattey, and M. Hetherington Interpretation and implications of genotype by environment interactions in advanced stage sugarcane selection trials in central Queensland Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53 2002 1035 1045
26. ® for Linear Models 4th ed. 2002 SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC 466 pp
27. D.L. Liu, and K.R. Helyar Simulation of seasonal stalk water content and fresh weight yield of sugarcane Field Crops Res. 82 2003 59 73
28. R.C. Magarey, and C.M. Mewing Effect of sugarcane cultivars and environment on inoculum density of Pachymetra chaunorhiza in Queensland Plant Dis. 78 1994 1193 1196
29. G.P. Meade Spencer-Meade Cane Sugar Handbook 1963 Wiley New York
30. J.D. Miller, and N.I. James Maturity of six sugarcane varieties in Florida Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 7 1977 107 111
31. S.B. Milligan Test site allocation within and among stages of a sugarcane breeding program Crop Sci. 34 1994 1184 1190
32. S.B. Milligan, K.A. Gravois, K.P. Bischoff, and F.A. Martin Crop effects on broad-sense heritabilities and genetic variances of sugarcane yield components Crop Sci. 30 1990 344 349
33. P.D.N. Mirzawan, M. Cooper, I.H. DeLacy, and D.M. Hogarth Retrospective analysis of the relationships among the test environments of the southern Queensland sugarcane breeding programme Theor. Appl. Genet. 88 1994 707 716
34. Redshaw, K., 2000. Agronomic evaluation of released varieties in South Africa. Intl. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. Agron. Workshop, 2-6 December 2000. FL, USA. Online abstract. http://issct.intnet.mu/agroabs.htm#4.
35. E. Rice Maturity studies of sugarcane varieties in Florida Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 4 1974 33 35
36. T.R. Sinclair, R.A. Gilbert, R.E. Perdomo, J.M. Shine Jr., G. Powell, and G. Montes Sugarcane leaf area development under field conditions in Florida, USA Field Crops Res. 88 2004 171 178