Interpretation and implications of genotype by environment interactions in advanced stage sugarcane selection trials in central Queensland

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 1035-1045

  Kimbeng, C A ^a   Rattey, A R ^a   Hetherington, M ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOTYPE; SUGAR CANE; YIELD;

AUSTRALIA;

ARUNDINARIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; SACCHARUM; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 0036379073     PISSN: 00049409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AR01190     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in plant breeding. Crop Science 4, 503-508.
2. BSES (1984) 'Laboratory manual for Australian sugar mills. Vol. 1. Principles and Practices.' (Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations: Brisabane, Australia)
3. Bull JK, Cooper M, Basford KE (1994) A procedure for investigating the number of genotypes required to provide a stable classification of environments. Field Crops Research 38, 47-56.
4. Bull JK, Hogarth DM, Basford KE (1992) Impact of genotype × environment interaction on response to selection in sugarcane. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32, 731-737.
5. Fox PN, Rosielle AA (1982) Reducing the influence of environmental main effects on pattern analysis of plant breeding environments. Euphytica 31, 645-656.
6. Hogarth DM, Mullins RT (1989) Changes in the BSES plant improvement program. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 20, 956-961.
7. Jackson PA, Hogarth DM (1992) Genotype × environment interactions in sugarcane. I. Patterns of response across sites and crop-years in North Queensland. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1447-1459.
8. Jackson PA, Horsley D, Foreman J, Hogarth DM, Wood AW (1991) Genotype × environment (GE) interactions in sugarcane variety trials in the Herbert. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 13, 103-109.
9. Jackson PA, McRae TA (2001) Selection of sugarcane clones in small plots: effects of plot size and selection criteria. Crop Science 41, 315-322.
10. Kang MS, Miller JD, Tai PYP, Dean JL, Glaz B (1987) Implications of confounding of genotype × year and genotype × crop effects in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 15, 349-355.
11. Kimbeng CA, Froyland D, Appo D, Corcoran A, Hetherington M (2001) An appraisal of early generation selection in the central Queensland sugarcane improvement program. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 23, 129-135.
12. McRae TA, Jackson PA (1998) Competition effects in selection trials. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 20, 154-161.
13. Milligan SB, Gravois KA, Bischoff KP, Martin FA (1990) Crop effects on broad-sense heritability and genetic variances of sugarcane yield components. Crop Science 30, 344-349.
14. Mirzawan PDN, Cooper M, DeLacy IH, Hogarth DM (1994) Retrospective analysis of the relationship among test environments of the southern Queensland sugarcane breeding programme. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88, 707-716.
15. Mirzawan PDN, Cooper M, Hogarth DM (1993) The impact of genotype by environment interactions for sugar yield on the use of indirect selection in south Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 629-638.
16. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58, 445-554.
17. Pollock JS (1979) Variety-environment interaction and selection. MAgrSc thesis, University of Queensland.
18. Pollock JS (1982) Variety selection in the Burdekin. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 4, 103-109.
19. Rattey AR, Kimbeng CA (2001) Genotype by environment interactions and resource allocation in final stage selection trials in the Burdekin district. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 23, 136-141.
20. SAS Institute Inc. (1997) 'SAS/STAT Release 6.12.' (SAS Inst. Inc.: Cary, NC)
21. Skinner JC (1965) Grading varieties for selection. Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists 12, 938-949.
22. Stringer JK, Cullis BR (2002) Application of spatial analysis techniques to adjust for fertility trends and identify interplot competition in early stage sugarcane selection trials. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 911-918.
23. SYSTAT 9 (1999) 'Statistics Vols I & II.' (SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL)