Post stroke urinary loss, incontinence and life satisfaction: When does post-stroke urinary loss become incontinence?

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 39-45

  Edwards, Dorothy F ^a,b,c   Hahn, Michele ^a   Dromerick, Alexander ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bladder; Cerebrovascular disorders; Neurogenic; Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; Stroke; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LIFE SATISFACTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; QUALITY OF LIFE; STROKE; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROC CURVE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SURVIVORS; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINATION DISORDERS;

EID: 30044432167     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20199     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams P. 2000. First international consultation on incontinence: Assessment and treatment recommendations. Lancet 355:2153-8.
2. Amir M, Lewin-Epstein N, Becker G, et al. 2002. Psychometric properties of the SF-12 (Hebrew version) in a primary care population in Israel. Med Care 40:918-28.
3. Barer DH. 1989. Continence after stroke: Useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Ageing 18:183-91.
4. Baum CM. 1995. The contribution of occupation to function in persons with Alzheimer's disease. J Occup Sci Aust 2:59-67.
5. Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, et al. 1981. The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787-805.
6. Brittain KR, Peet SM, Castleden CM. 1998. Stroke and incontinence. Stroke 29:524-8.
7. Brocklehurst JC, Andrews K, Richards B, et al. 1985. Incidence and correlates of incontinence in stroke patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 33:540-2.
8. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. 1989. Measurement of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864-70.
9. Everard KM, Lach HW, Fisher EB, et al. 2000. Relationship of activity and social support to the functional health of older adults. J Gerontol Soc Sci 55B:S208-12.
10. Fantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J, et al. 1996. Urinary incontinence in adults: Acute and chronic management. Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 2 AHCPR Publication No. 96-0682. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
11. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, et al. 1988. The Stroke Data Bank: Design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 19:547-54.
12. Gelber DA, Good DC, Laven LJ, et al. 1993. Causes of urinary incontinence after acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 24:378-82.
13. Grimby A, Milsom I, Molander U, et al. 1993. The influence of urinary incontinence on quality of life in elderly women. Age Ageing 22:82-9.
14. Gross JC. 1998. A comparison of the characteristics of incontinent and continent stroke patients in a rehabilitation program. Rehabil Nurs 23:132-40.
15. Gross JC. 2000. Urinary incontinence and stroke outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:22-7.
16. Hall KM, Hamilton BB, Gordon WA, et al. 1993. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability rating scale, functional independence measure, and functional assessment measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 8:60-74.
17. Hanley JA. 1989. Receiver operating characteristic methodology: The state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 29:307-34.
18. Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, et al. 1999. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM + FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: A psychometric analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:749-54.
19. Jongbloed L. 1986. Prediction of function after stroke: A critical review. Stroke 17:765-76.
20. Katz N, Karpin H, Lak A, et al. 2003. Participation in occupational performance: Reliability and validity of the Activity Card Sort. OTJR 23:10-7.
21. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. 1987. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Advance Clinical Rehabilitation 1:6-18.
22. MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, et al. 2002. On the practice of dichotimization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 7:19-40.
23. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Pedersen PM, et al. 1997. Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 28:58-62.
24. Patel MCC, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. 2001. Natural history and effects on 2-year outcomes of urinary incontinence after stroke. Stroke 32:122-27.
25. Sampselle CM, Harlow SD, Skurnick J, et al. 2002. Urinary incontinence predictors and life impact in ethnically diverse perimenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 100:1230-8.
26. Smith PM, et al. 1996. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessments using the functional independence measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:431-5.
27. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JEJ. 1988. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 26:724-35.
28. Symonds T. 2003. A review of condition-specific instruments to assess the impact of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life. Eur Urol 43:219-25.
29. van Straten A, et al. 1997. A stroke-adapted 30 item version of the sickness impact profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 28:2155-61.
30. Wade DT, Hewer RL. 1985. Outlook after an acute stroke: Urinary incontinence and loss of consciousness compared in 532 patients. Q J Med 56:601-8.
31. Wade DT, Hewer RL. 1987. Functional abilities after stroke: Measurement, natural history, and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:177-82.
32. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, et al. 1996. Incontinence after stroke in a rehabilitation setting: Outcome associations and predictive factors. Neurol 47:659-63.
33. Wood-Dauphinee S, Opzoomer A, Williams JL, et al. 1988. Assessment of global function: The reintegration of normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:585-90.
34. World Health Organization. 2001. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.