A prospective multicenter clinical and endoscopic follow-up study of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie

Volumn 43, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1303-1307

  Bajbouj, M ^a   Reichenberger, J ^a   Neu, B ^a   Prinz, C ^a   Schmid, R M ^a   Rosch T ^a   Meining, Alexander ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endoscopy; Follow up; Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Indexed keywords

PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTESTINE METAPLASIA; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ENDOSCOPES, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 29944445790     PISSN: 00442771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858874     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Nilsson M, Johnsen R, Ye W et al. Prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and the influence of age and sex. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 1040-1045
2. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1448-1456
3. Klauser AG, Schindlbeck NE, Müller-Lissner SA. Symptoms in gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 1990; 335: 205-208
4. Fass R, Ofman JJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease - should we adopt a new conceptual framework? Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1901-1909
5. Pace F, Bollani S, Molteni P et al. Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD) - a reappraisal 10 years on. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36: 111-115
6. Pace F, Bianchi Porro G. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a typical spectrum disease (a new conceptual framework is not needed). Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 229-240
7. Fass R. Distinct phenotypic presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a new view of the natural history. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 100-107
8. Meining A, Ott R, Becker I et al. The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only - what is the clinical significance? Gut 2004; 53: 1402-1407
9. Meining A, Classen M. The role of diet and lifestyle measures in the pathogenesis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2692-2697
10. Quigley EM. Functional dyspepsia (FD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD): overlapping or discrete entities? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 18: 695-706
11. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 85-92
12. Kiesslich R, Kanzler S, Vieth M et al. Minimal change esophagitis: prospective comparison of endoscopic and histological markers between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and normal controls using magnifying endoscopy. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 221-227
13. Rath HC, Timmer A, Kunkel C et al. Comparison of interobserver agreement for different scoring systems for reflux esophagitis: Impact of level of experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 44-49
14. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-180
15. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA et al. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet 1994; 344: 1533-1536
16. Weinstein WM, Ippoliti AF. The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus: goblets, goblets, goblets. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 91-94
17. Padda S, Ramirez FC. Accuracy in the diagnosis of short-segment Barrett's esophagus: the role of endoscopic experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 605-608
18. Egger K, Meining A, Werner M et al. Endoscopic measurement of Barrett's esophagus length is unreliable - a prospective comparative biopsy study. Z Gastroenterol 2004; 42: 499-504
19. Johnston MH, Hammond AS, Laskin W et al. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of short segments of specialized intestinal metaplasia in the distal esophagus on routine endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1507-1511
20. Öberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester T et al. Inflammation and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 522-532
21. Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004; 53: 1024-1031
22. Kawamura O, Aslam M, Rittmann T et al. Physical and pH properties of gastroesophagopharyngeal refluxate: a 24-hour simultaneous ambulatory impedance and pH monitoring study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1000-1010