Pupil light reflex in normal and diseased eyes: Diagnosis of visual dysfunction using waveform partitioning

Ophthalmology

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 106-114

  Bergamin, Oliver ^a   Bridget Zimmerman, M ^b   Kardon, Randy H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL REFLEX; PUPILLOGRAPHY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; WAVEFORM; WAVEFORM PARTITIONING;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; LIGHT; PUPIL; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0037226750     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01445-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 1981;26:39-42.
2. Thompson HS, Afferent pupillary defects. Pupillary findings associated with defects of the afferent arm of the pupillary light reflex arc. Am J Ophthalmol 1966;62:860-73.
3. Johnson LN, Hill RA, Bartholomew MJ. Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1988;95:1649-55.
4. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:351-6.
5. Lagrèze WDA, Kardon RH. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:401-4.
6. Lowenstein O, Kawabata H, Loewenfeld IE. The pupil as indicator of retinal activity. Am J Ophthalmol 1964;57:569-96.
7. Bremner FD, Shallo-Hoffmann J, Riordan-Eva P, Smith SE. Comparing pupil function with visual function in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2528-34.
8. Loewenfeld IE. The light reflex. In: Butterworth H, ed. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann, 1999; chap. 3.
9. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Long-term fluctuation of relative afferent pupillary defect in subjects with normal visual function. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:875-82.
10. Hong S, Narkiewicz J, Kardon RH. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:957-65.
11. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:622-33.
12. Bos JE. Detection of the pupil constriction latency. Med Biol Eng Comput 1991;29:529-34.
13. Feinberg R, Podolak E. Latency of pupillary reflex to light stimulation and its relationship to aging. In: Welford AT, Birren JE, eds. Behavior, Aging and the Nervous System. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1965:326-39.
14. Bergamin O, Schoetzau A, Sugimoto K, Zulauf M. The influence of iris color on the pupillary light reflex. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:567-70.
15. Grehn F, Grüsser OJ, Stange D. Effect of short-term intraocular pressure increase on cat retinal ganglion cell activity. Behav Brain Res 1984;14:109-21.
16. Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1959;62:768-79.
17. Bergamin O, Kardon RH. Greater pupillary escape differentiates central from peripheral visual field loss. Ophthalmology 2002;109:771-80.
18. Ellis CJK. The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 1981;65:754-9.
19. Ellis CJK. The afferent pupillary defect in acute optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:1008-17.