The linguistics of object-oriented design: Implications-for teaching

Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 188-192

  Holmboe, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Learning; Natural language; Object orientation; Socio cultural perspective; System development; Teaching

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; NATURAL LANGUAGES; OBJECT ORIENTATION; SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; CURRICULA; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 29844442186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1067445.1067498     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Agarwal, R., A.P. Sinha, and M. Tanniru, The role of prior experience and task characteristics in object-oriented modeling: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1996. 45(6): p. 639-667.
2. Coad, P. and E. Yourdon, Object-Oriented Analysis. 2nd ed. 1991, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Corritore, C.L. and S. Wiedenbeck, An exploratory study of program comprehension strategies of procedural and object-oriented programmers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2001. 54(1): p. 1-23.
4. Détienne, F., Software Design - Cognitive Aspects. 2002, London: Springer.
5. Hoc, J.-M. and A. Nguyen-Xuan, Language Semantics, Mental Models and Analogy, in Psychology of Programming, J.-M. Hoc, et al., Editors. 1990, Academic Press: London. p. 139-152.
6. Holmboe, C. and P.H. Scott, Characterising individual and social concept development in collaborative computer science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 2005. 24(1). p. 89-115.
7. Holmboe, C., A Wittgenstein Approach to the Learning of OO modelling. Computer Science Education, 2004. 14(4) p. 175-194.
8. Holmboe, C., Conceptualisation and Labelling as Linguistic Challenges for Students of Data Modelling. Computer Science Education, 2005. 15(2).
9. Holmboe, C. and E. Knain, A semiotic framework for learning UML as technical discourse, submitted manuscript, 2005.
10. Kolikant, Y.B.-D., Learning Concurrency as an Entry Point to the Community of CS Practitioners. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 2004. 23(1): p. 21-46.
11. Mercer, N., The guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learners. 1995, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
12. Shackelford, R.L. and A.N. Badre, Why can't smart students solve simple programming problems? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1993. 38: p. 985-997.
13. Säljö, R., Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link, in Learning with Computers. Analyzing productive interaction, K. Littleton and P. Light, Editors. 1998, Routledge: London, p. 144-161.
14. Taylor, J., Analyzing Novices Analyzing Prolog - What Stories Do Novices Tell Themselves About Prolog. Instructional Science, 1990. 19(4-5): p. 283-309.
15. Visser, W. and J.-M. Hoc, Expert Software Design Strategies, in Psychology of Programming, J.-M. Hoc, et al., Editors. 1990, Academic Press: London, p. 235-250.
16. Vygotsky, L., Thought and Language, ed. A. Kozulin. 1986, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Wenger, E., Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. 1998, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations. 2nd ed. 1958, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
19. Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 1961, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. Wood, D.J., J.S. Bruner, and G. Ross, The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 1976.17: p. 89-100.