Exploratory study of program comprehension strategies of procedural and object-oriented programmers

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-23

  Corritore, Cynthia L ^a   Wiedenbeck, Susan ^b  

^a CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PROCEDURE ORIENTED LANGUAGES;

BREADTH OF COMPREHENSION; COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY; DIRECTION OF COMPREHENSION; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMERS; PROCEDURAL PROGRAMMERS; PROGRAM COMPREHENSION; PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING;

PROGRAM DIAGNOSTICS;

EID: 0035104420     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0423     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BERGANTZ D., HASSELL J. Information relationships in PROLOG programs: how do programmers comprehend functionality? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 35:1991;313-328.
2. BRIAND L. C., BUNSE C., DALY J. W., DIFFERDING C. An experimental comparison of the maintainability of object-oriented and structured design documents. Empirical Software Engineering. 2:1997;291-312.
3. BROOKS R. Towards a theory of the comprehension of computer programs. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 18:1983;543-554.
4. BURKHARDT J.-M., DÉTIENNE F., WIEDENBECK S. Mental representations constructed by experts and novices in object-oriented program comprehension. Proceedings of INTERACT'97: 6th IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1997;North-Holland, Amsterdam. p. 339-346.
5. BURKHARDT J.-M., DÉTIENNE F., WIEDENBECK S. The effect of object-oriented programming expertise in several dimensions of comprehension strategies. IWPC'98: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1998;IEEE, New York. p. 82-89.
6. CANFORA G., MANCINI L., TORTORELLA M. A workbench for program comprehension during software maintenance. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1996;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. p. 30-39.
7. COHEN J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences. 1977;Academic, New York.
8. CORRITORE C. L., WIEDENBECK S. What do novices learn during program comprehension? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 3:1991;199-208.
9. CORRITORE C. L., WIEDENBECK S. Mental representations of expert procedural and object-oriented programmers in a software maintenance task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 50:1999;61-83.
10. COX B. Object-Oriented Programming. 1986;Addison-Wesley, Reading.
11. DALY J., BROOKS A., MILLER J., ROPER M., WOOD M. Evaluating inheritance depth on the maintainability of object-oriented software. Empirical Software Engineering. 1:1996;109-132.
12. FISHER G. Cognitive view of reuse and design. IEEE Software. 7:1987;60-72.
13. GELLENBECK E. M., & COOK C. R. An investigation of procedure and variable names as beacons during program comprehension. KOENEMANN-BELLIVEAU J., MOHER T. G., ROBERTSON S. P. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fourth Workshop. 1991;65-79 Ablex, Norwood.
14. GILMORE D. J., GREEN T. R. G. Comprehension and recall of miniature programs. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 21:1984;31-48.
15. GWINN J. Object-oriented programs in realtime. SIGPLAN Notices. 27:1992;47-56.
16. HENRY S., HUMPHREY M. Object-oriented vs. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming. 6:1993;41-49.
17. JACKY J., KALET I. An object-oriented programming discipline for standard Pascal. Communications of the ACM. 30:1987;772-776.
18. KOENEMANN J., ROBERTSON S. Expert problem solving strategies for program comprehension. CHI'91 Proceedings. 1991;ACM, New York. p. 125-130.
19. LANGE B., MOHER T. Some strategies of reuse in an object-oriented programming environment. CHI'89 Proceedings. 1989;ACM, New York. p. 69-73.
20. LAYZELL P., CHAMPION R., FREEMAN M. DOCKET: program comprehension-in-the-large. Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1993;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. p. 140-148.
21. LEE A., PENNINGTON N. The effects of paradigm on cognitive activities in design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 40:1994;577-601.
22. LETOVSKY S. Cognitive processes in program comprehension. Soloway E., Iyengar S. Empirical Studies of Programmers. 1986;80-98 Ablex, Norwood.
23. LITTMAN D. C., PINTO J., LETOVSKY S., SOLOWAY E. Mental models and software maintenance. SOLOWAY E., IYENGAR S. Empirical Studies of Programmers. 1986;80-98 Ablex, Norwood.
24. PENNINGTON N. Comprehension strategies in programming. Olson G., Sheppard S., Soloway E. Empirical Studies of Programmers: 2nd Workshop. 1987a;100-113 Ablex, Norwood.
25. PENNINGTON N. Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987b;295-341.
26. PENNINGTON N., LEE A. Y., REHDER B. Cognitive activities and levels of abstraction in procedural and object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction. 10:1995;171-226.
27. RAJLICH V., DORAN J., GUDLA R. T. S. Layered explanations of software: a methodology for program comprehension. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1994;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. p. 46-52.
28. RENTSCH T. Object-oriented programming. SIGPLAN Notices. 17:1982;51-57.
29. ROSSON M. B., ALPERT S. R. The cognitive consequences of object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction. 5:1990;345-379.
30. SHAFT T. M., VESSEY I. The relevance of application domain knowledge: the case of computer program comprehension. Information Systems Research. 6:1995;286-299.
31. SHNEIDERMAN B., MAYER R. Syntactic/semantic interactions in programmer behavior: a model and experimental results. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences. 8:1979;219-238.
32. SOLOWAY E., ADELSON B., EHRLICH K. Knowledge and processes in the comprehension of computer programs. CHI M., GLASER R., FARR M. The Nature of Expertise. 1988;129-152 Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway.
33. SOLOWAY E., EHRLICH K. Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. SE-10:1984;595-609.
34. SOLOWAY E., EHRLICH K., BONAR J., GREENSPAN J. What do novices know about programming? Badre A., Shneiderman B. Directions in Human-Computer Interaction. 1982;27-54 Ablex, Norwood.
35. SOLOWAY E., PINTO J., LETOVSKY S., LITTMAN D., LAMPERT R. Designing documentation to compensate for delocalized plans. Communications of the ACM. 31:1988;1259-1267.
36. TILLEY S. R., PAUL S., SMITH D. R. Towards a framework for program understanding. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1996;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. p. 19-28.
37. VON MAYRHAUSER A., VANS A. M. Program comprehension during software maintenance and evolution. Computer. 28:1995a;44-55.
38. VON MAYRHAUSER A., VANS A. M. Program understanding: models and experiments. Yovits M. C., Zelkowitz M. V. Advances in Computers. 40:1995b;1-38 Academic Press, San Diego.
39. VON MAYRHAUSER A., VANS A. M. Identification of dynamic comprehension processes during large scale maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 22:1996;424-437.
40. VON MAYRHAUSER A., VANS A. M. Program understanding behavior during debugging of large scale software. WIEDENBECK S., SCHOLTZ J. C. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Seventh Workshop. 1997;157-179 Ablex, Norwood.
41. VON MAYRHAUSER A., VANS A. M. Program understanding behavior during adaptation of large scale software. IWPC'98: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1998;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos. p. 164-172.
42. WIEDENBECK S. Beacons in computer program comprehension. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 25:1986;697-709.
43. WIEDENBECK S. The initial stage of program comprehension. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 35:1991;517-540.