Marine ecotoxic effect of pulse emissions in life cycle impact assessment

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 297-303

  Pettersen, Johan ^a   Peters, Glen P ^a   Hertwich, Edgar G ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ecotoxicity; Fate; Life cycle impact assessment; Pulse; Transient

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BIODIVERSITY; GRADIENT METHODS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; TOXICITY;

ECOTOXICITY; FATE; LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PULSE;

MARINE POLLUTION;

ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LIFE CYCLE; MARINE ECOSYSTEM;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DOSE RESPONSE; ECOTOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STEADY STATE;

ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEAWATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 29744468566     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/04-510R.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rye H, Reed M, Ekrol N. 1998. Sensitivity analysis and simulation of dispersed oil concentrations in the North Sea with the PROVANN model. Environmental Modelling & Software 13:423-429.
2. Faksness L-G, Grini PG, Daling PS. 2004. Partitioning of semi-soluble organic compounds between the water phase and oil droplets in produced water. Mar Pollut Bull 48:731-742.
3. International Organization for Standardization. ISO standards 14040-14043: Environmental management-Life cycle assessment. Geneva, Switzerland.
4. Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöppfer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen I, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B, eds. 2002. Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice. SETAC, Pensacola FL, USA.
5. Guinéc JB, ed. 2002. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
6. Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinèe JB, Jager T, Kalf D, van de Meent D, van de Ragas AMJ, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Reijnders L. 2000. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part 1: Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. Chemosphere 45:659-669.
7. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R. 2001. The eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, 3rd ed. Report 1999/36A. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, The Hague, The Netherlands.
8. Hauschild M, Pennington DW. 2002. Indicators for ecotoxicity in life-cycle impact assessment. In Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöppfer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen I, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B, eds, Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice. SETAC, Pensacola FL, USA, pp 149-176.
9. Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Rydberg T, Rebitzer G. 2004. Life cycle assessment. Part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environ Int 30:721-739.
10. Pennington DW, Payet J, Hauschild M. 2004. Aquatic ecotoxicological indicators in life-cycle assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1796-1807.
11. Hertwich E, Jolliet O, Hauschild M, Schulze C, Krewitt W, Huijbregts M. 2002. Fate and exposure assessment in the life-cycle impact assessment of toxic chemicals. In Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöppfer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen I, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B, eds, Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice. SETAC, Pensacola FL, USA, pp 105-126.
12. Heijungs R. 1995. Harmonization of methods for impact assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2:217-224.
13. Huijbregts MAJ, Van de Meent D, Goedkoop M, Spriensma R. 2002. Ecotoxicological impacts in life cycle assessment. In Posthuma L, Suter G, Traas TR eds, Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 421-433.
14. Van de Meent D, Huijbregts MAJ. 2005. Calculating life-cycle assessment effect factors from potentially affected fraction-based ecotoxicological response functions. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1573-1578.
15. Posthuma L, Traas TP, Suter GW. 2002. General introduction to species sensitivity distributions. In Posthuma L, Suter G, Traas TR eds, Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 3-10.
16. Van Straalen NM. 2002. Theory of ecological risk assessment based on species sensitivity distributions. In Posthuma L, Suter G, Traas TP, eds, Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 37-48.
17. Klepper O, Bakker J, Traas TP, Van de Meent D. 1998. Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as a basis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substances and regions. J Hazard Mater 61:337-344.
18. Aldenberg T, Slob W. 1993. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 25:48-63.
19. Hamers T, Aldenberg T, Van de Meent D. 1996. Definition report-Indicator effects toxic substances (Itox). Report 607128001. Final Report. National Institute of Public Health and Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
20. Faust M, Altenburger R, Backhaus T, Blanck H, Boedeker W, Gramatica P, Hamer V, Scholze M, Vighi M, Grimme LH. 2003. Joint algal toxicity of 16 dissimilarly acting chemicals is predictable by the concept of independent action. Aquat Toxicol 63:43-63.
21. Verslycke T, Vangheluwe M, Heijerick D, De Schamphelaere K, Van Sprang P, Janssen CR. 2003. The toxicity of metal mixtures to the estuarine mysid Neomysis integer (Crustacea: Mysidacea) under changing salinity. Aquat Toxicol 64:307-315.
22. Backhaus T, Scholze M, Grimme LH. 2000. The single substance and mixture toxicity of quinolones to the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri. Aquat Toxicol 49:49-61.
23. Altenburger R, Backhaus T, Boedeker W, Faust M, Scholze M, Grimme LH. 2000. Predictability of the toxicity of multiple chemical mixtures to Vibrio fischeri: Mixtures composed of similarly acting chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2341-2347.
24. Backhaus T, Altenburger R, Arrhenius Å, Blanck H, Faust M, Finizio A, Gramatica P, Groteb M, Junghans M, Meyer W, Pavan M, Porsbring T, Scholze M, Todeschini R, Vighi M, Walter H, Grimme LH. 2003. The BEAM-project: Prediction and assessment of mixture toxicities in the aquatic environment. Continental Shelf Research 23:1757-1769.
25. COMSOL AB. 2004. Femlab 3.0. Stockholm, Sweden.
26. Bowden KF. 1983. Physical Oceanography of Coastal Waters. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.
27. Okubo A. 1971. Oceanic diffusion diagrams. Deep-Sea Res 18:789-802.
28. Kullenberg G. 1982. Pollutant Transfer and Transport in the Sea, Vol 1. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
29. De Zwart D. 2002. Observed regularities in species sensitivity distributions for aquatic species. In Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TR eds, Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 133-154.