Making ethics work in collaborative projects

Australian Journal of Primary Health

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 101-107

  Mauldon, Emily ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Applied ethics; Collaborative research; Ethical review; Novice researchers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPT FORMATION; EDUCATION; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOMENCLATURE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 29744441091     PISSN: 14487527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/PY05049     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Armstrong, D., (1977). Clinical sense and clinical science. Social Science and Medicine, 11, 599-601.
2. Babbie, E. (2002). The Basics of Social Research (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Charlesworth, M., (1996). What's the use of bioethics? In J. Daly (Ed.), Ethical Intersections: Health research, methods and researcher responsibility (pp. 5-14). St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
4. Daly, J., & McDonald. L. (1996). Ethical responsibilities and health research. In J. Daly (Ed.), Ethical Intersections: Health research, methods and researcher responsibility (pp xiii-xxi). St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
5. Guillemin, M., & Gillman, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and 'Ethically important moments' in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (2), 261-280.
6. Jamrozik, K., (2004). Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost? British Medical Journal, 329, 286-287.
7. Jones, A.M., & Bamford, D., (2004). The other face of research governance. British Medical Journal, 329, 280-281.
8. Liauw, W., & Day, R.O., (2003). Adverse event reporting in clinical trials: Room for improvement. Medical Journal of Australia, 179 (8), 426-428.
9. Marks, H.M., (1997). The Progress of Experiment. Scientific reform in the United States 1900-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. May, C., & Mead, N., (1999). Patient-centredness; a history. In C. Dowrick & L. Frith (Eds.), General Practice and Ethics: uncertainty and responsibility, (pp 76-90). London: Routledge.
11. Meinert, C.L., (1986). Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct and Analysis. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Mueller, C.B., (1995). Breast Cancer Trials on Trial: A case of conflicting ethical interests. Cancer, 75 (10), 2403-2406.
13. National Health and Medical Research Council, (2001) National Statement of Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Retrieved October 29, 2004 from http://www7.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/humans/preamble.htm
14. Parker, M. & Dickenson, D. (2001). The Cambridge Medical Ethics Workbook: Case studies, commentaries and activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Rogers, W.A., & Braunack-Myer, A.J., (2004). Practical Ethics for General Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Rogers, W., & Braunack-Mayer, A., (2000). Handling information: Some ethical issues. Australian Family Physicial, 29 (8), August, 806-808.
17. Schapiro, S., & Louis, T. (Eds.). (1983). Clinical Trials: Issues and Approaches, New York: Marcel Dekker.
18. Ten Have, H., & Lelie, A. (1998). Medical ethics research: Between theory and practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 19, 263-276.
19. Walsh, M.K., McNeil, J.J., & Breen, K.J., (2005). Improving the governance of health research. Medical Journal of Australia, 182 (9), 468-471.
20. Ward, H.J., Cousen, S.N., Smith-Bathgate, B., Leitch, M., Everington, D., Will, R.G., & Smith, P.C. (2004). Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. British Medical Journal, 329, 277-279.
21. Wass, A., (2000). Promoting Health: The Primary Health Care Approach (2nd ed.). Sydney: Saunders.
22. Whitman, D.C., Webb, P.M., Purdie, D.M., & Green, A.C., (2003). National Ethics Committee Urgently Needed. Medical Journal of Australia, 178(4), 187.