Periodic direct current does not promote wound closure in an in vitro dynamic model of cell migration

Physical Therapy

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 50-59

  Godbout, Charles ^a   Frenette, Jérôme ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Direct current; Electrical stimulation; Fibroblast; Galvanotaxis; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MIGRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT CURRENT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; FIBROBLAST; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; LAMELLIPODIUM; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; RAT; TELEVISION MICROSCOPY; VELOCITY; VIDEORECORDING; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 29744436879     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/86.1.50     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Thiery JP. Mechanisms of cell migration in the vertebrate embryo. Cell Differ. 1984;15:1-15.
2. Devreotes P, Janetopoulos C. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: distinctions between directional sensing and polarization. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20445-20448.
3. Schratzberger P, Kahler CM, Wiedermann CJ. Use of fluorochromes in the determination of chemotaxis and haptotaxis of granulocytes by micropore filter assays. Ann Hematol. 1996;72:23-27.
4. Robinson KR. The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. J Cell Biol. 1985;101:2023-2027.
5. Onuma EK, Hui SW. Electric field-directed cell shape changes, displacement, and cytoskeletal reorganization are calcium dependent. J Cell Biol. 1988;106:2067-2075.
6. Rajnicek AM, Robinson KR, McCaig CD. The direction of neurite growth in a weak DC electric field depends on the substratum: contributions of adhesivity and net surface charge. Dev Biol. 1998;203:412-423.
7. Hotary KB, Robinson KR. Endogenous electrical currents and the resultant voltage gradients in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1990;140:149-160.
8. Hotary KB, Robinson KR. Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption. Dev Biol. 1994;166:789-800.
9. Barker AT, Jaffe LF, Vanable JW Jr. The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am J Physiol. 1982;242:R358-R366.
10. Borgens RB, Robinson KR, Vanable JW Jr, et al. Electric Fields in Vertebrate Repair: Natural and Applied Voltages in Vertebrate Regeneration and Healing. New York, NY: Alan R Liss; 1989.
11. McCaig CD, Zhao M. Physiological electrical fields modify cell behaviour. Bioessays. 1997;19:819-826.
12. Feedar JA, Kloth LC, Gentzkow GD. Chronic dermal ulcer healing enhanced with monophasic pulsed electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 1991;71:639-649.
13. Baker LL, Chambers R, DeMuth SK, Villar F. Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:405-412.
14. Kloth LC, Feedar JA. Acceleration of wound healing with high voltage, monophasic, pulsed current. Phys Ther. 1988;68:503-508.
15. Lundeberg TC, Eriksson SV, Malm M. Electrical nerve stimulation improves healing of diabetic ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29:328-331.
16. Wood JM, Evans PE III, Schallreuter KU, et al. A multicenter study on the use of pulsed low-intensity direct current for healing chronic stage II and stage III decubitus ulcers. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:999-1009.
17. Goodwin CB, Brighton CT, Guyer RD, et al. A double-blind study of capacitively coupled electrical stimulation as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusions. Spine. 1999;24:1349-1356; discussion 1357.
18. Mammi GI, Rocchi R, Cadossi R, et al. The electrical stimulation of tibial osteotomies: double-blind study. Clin Orthop. 1993;(288):246-253.
19. Rogozinski A, Rogozinski C. Efficacy of implanted bone growth stimulation in instrumented lumbosacral spinal fusion. Spine. 1996;21:2479-2483.
20. Dejardin LM, Kahanovitz N, Arnoczky SP, Simon BJ. The effect of varied electrical current densities on lumbar spinal fusions in dogs. Spine J. 2001;1:341-347.
21. Toth JM, Seim HB III, Schwardt JD, et al. Direct current electrical stimulation increases the fusion rate of spinal fusion cages. Spine. 2000;25:2580-2587.
22. France JC, Norman TL, Santrock RD, et al. The efficacy of direct current stimulation for lumbar intertransverse process fusions in an animal model. Spine. 2001;26:1002-1008.
23. 2+ influx and the exposure of additional insulin receptors. J Cell Physiol. 1989;140:379-385.
24. Bourguignon GJ, Bourguignon LY. Electric stimulation of protein and DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts. FASEB J. 1987;1:398-402.
25. Korhoda W, Mycielska M, Janda E, Madeja Z. Immediate and long-term galvanotactic responses of Amoeba proteus to DC electric fields. Cell Motif Cytoskeleton. 2000;45:10-26.
26. Ferrier J, Ross SM, Kanehisa J, Aubin JE. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts migrate in opposite directions in response to a constant electrical field. J Cell Physiol. 1986;129:283-288.
27. Soong HK, Parkinson WC, Sulik GL, Bafna S. Effects of electric fields on cytoskeleton of corneal stromal fibroblasts. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:893-901.
28. Gruler H, Nuccitelli R. Neural crest cell galvanotaxis: new data and a novel approach to the analysis of both galvanotaxis and chemotaxis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;19:121-133.
29. Wang E, Zhao M, Forrester JV, McCaig CD. Re-orientation and faster, directed migration of lens epithelial cells in a physiological electric field. Exp Eye Res. 2000;71:91-98.
30. Farboud B, Nuccitelli R, Schwab IR, Isseroff RR. DC electric fields induce rapid directional migration in cultured human corneal epithelial cell. Exp Eye Res. 2000;70:667-673.
31. Rapp D, de Boisfleury-Chevance A, Gruler H. Galvanotaxis of human granulocytes: dose-response curve. Eur Biophys J. 1988;16:313-319.
32. Stump RF, Robinson KR. Xenopus neural crest cell migration in an applied electrical field. J Cell Biol. 1983;97:1226-1233.
33. Erickson CA, Nuccitelli R. Embryonic fibroblast motility and orientation can be influenced by physiological electric fields. J Cell Biol. 1984;98:296-307.
34. Sheridan DM, Isseroff RR, Nuccitelli R. Imposition of a physiologic DC electric field alters the migratory response of human keratinocytes on extracellular matrix molecules. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;106:642-646.
35. Fang KS, Farboud B, Nuccitelli R, Isseroff RR. Migration of human keratinocytes in electric fields requires growth factors and extracellular calcium. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:751-756.
36. Freshney RI. Tumour cells disaggregated in collagenase. Lancet. 1972;2(7775):488-489.
37. Galiacy S, Planus E, Lepetit H, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor promotes cell motility during alveolar epithelial repair in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 2003;283:215-229.
38. Green JA, Stockton RA, Johnson C, Jacobson BS. 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase regulate wound closure in NIH/3T3 fibroblast monolayers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287:C373-C383.
39. Aarbiou J, Verhoosel RM, Van Wetering S, et al. Neutrophil defensins enhances lung epithelial wound closure and mucin gene expression in vitro. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30:193-201.
40. Desai LP, Aryal AM, Ceacareanu R, et al. RhoA and Racl are both required for excellent wound closure of airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;287:L1134-L1144.
41. Huang C, Rajfur Z, Borchers C, et al. JNK Phosphorylates paxillin and regulates cell migration. Nature. 2003;424:219-223.
42. Providence KM, Higgins PJ. PAI-1 expression is required for epithelial cell migration in two distinct phases of in vitro wound repair. J Cell Physiol. 2004;200:297-308.
43. Shirakata Y, Kimura R, Nanba D, et al. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor accelerates keratinocyte migration and skin wound healing. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(pt 11):2362-2370.
44. Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:738-746.
45. Ojingwa JC, Isseroff RR. Electrical stimulation of wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:1-12.
46. Mycielska ME, Djamgoz MB. Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 9):1631-1639.
47. Nishimura KY, Isseroff RR, Nuccitelli R. Human keratinocytes migrate to the negative pole in direct current electric fields comparable to those measured in mammalian wounds. J Cell Sci. 1996;109 (pt 1):199-207.
48. Sta Iglesia DD, Cragoe EJ Jr, Vanable JW Jr. Electric field strength and epithelization in the newt (Notophthalmus vindescens). J Exp Zool. 1996;274(1):56-62.
49. Trollinger DR, Isseroff RR, Nuccitelli R. Calcium channel blockers inhibit galvanotaxis in human keratinocytes. J Cell Physiol. 2002;193:1-9.
50. Wang E, Zhao M, Forrester JV, McCaig CD. Bi-directional migration of lens epithelial cells in a physiological electrical field. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:29-37.
51. Fang KS, Ionides E, Oster G, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor relocalization and kinase activity are necessary for directional migration of keratinocytes in DC electric fields. J Cell Sci. 1999;112 (pt 12):1967-1978.
52. Pullar CE, Isseroff RR, Nuccitelli R. Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A plays a role in the directed migration of human keratinocytes in a DC electric field. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2001;50:2078-217.
53. Zhao M, Agius-Fernandez A, Forrester JV, McCaig CD. Orientation and directed migration of cultured corneal epithelial cells in small electric fields are serum dependent. J Cell Sci. 1996;109 (pt 6):1405-1414.
54. Horwitz AR, Parsons JT. Cell migration-movin' on. Science. 1999;286:1102-1103.
55. Finkelstein E, Chang W, Chao PH, et al. Roles of microtubules, cell polarity and adhesion in electric-field-mediated motility of 3T3 fibroblasts. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(pt 8):1533-1545.
56. Grahn JC, Reilly DA, Nuccitelli RL, Isseroff RR. Melanocytes do not migrate directionally in physiological DC electric fields. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11:64-70.
57. Sillman AL, Quang DM, Farboud B, et al. Human dermal fibroblasts do not exhibit directional migration on collagen I in direct-current electric fields of physiological strength. Exp Dermatol. 2003;12:396-402.
58. Parkins CS, Hill SA, Lonergan SJ, et al. Ischaemia induced cell death in tumors: importance of temperature and pH. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29:499-503.
59. Lubec B, Dell'Anna E, Fang-Kircher S, et al. Decrease of brain protein kinase C, protein kinase A, and cyclin-dependent kinase correlating with pH precedes neuronal death in neonatal asphyxia. J Investig Med. 1997;45:284-294.
60. Mukhin AG, Ivanova SA, Allen JW, Faden AI. Mechanical injury to neuronal/glial cultures in microplates: role of NMDA receptors and pH in secondary neuronal cell death. J Neurosci Res. 1998;51:748-758.
61. Lee YJ, Song JJ, Kim JH, et al. Low extracellular pH augments TRAIL-induced apoptotic death through the mitochondria-mediated caspase signal transduction pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2004;293:129-143.
62. Rabinovitch M, DeStefano MJ. Spontaneous migration of normal human polymorphonuclear neutrophils under agarose: enhancement by media of lowered pH or osmolality. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1981;29:329-339.
63. Rotstein OD, Fiegel VD, Simmons RL, Knighton DR. The deleterious effect of reduced pH and hypoxia on neutrophil migration in vitro. J Surg Res. 1988;45:298-303.
64. Serrano CV Jr, Fraticelli A, Paniccia R, et al. pH dependence of neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion and adhesion molecule expression. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(3 pt 1):C962-C970.
65. Faff L, Nolle C. Extracellular acidification decreases the basal motility of cultured mouse microglia via the rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. Brain Res. 2000;853:22-31.
66. Lengheden A, Jansson L. pH effects on experimental wound healing of human fibroblasts in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:148-155.
67. Lengheden A. Influence of pH and calcium on growth and attachment of human fibroblasts in vitro. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102:130-136.
68. Blomlof J, Jansson L, Blomlof L, Lindskog S. Long-time etching at low pH jeopardizes periodontal healing. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22:459-463.
69. Aukhil I, Pettersson E. Effect of citric acid conditioning on fibroblast cell density in periodontal wounds. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:80-84.
70. Lan WC, Lan WH, Chan CP, et al. The effects of extracellular citric acid acidosis on the viability, cellular adhesion capacity and protein synthesis of cultured human gingival fibroblasts. Aust Dent J. 1999;44:123-130.
71. Zhao M, Dick A, Forrester JV, McCaig CD. Electric field-directed cell motility involves up-regulated expression and asymmetric redistribution of the epidermal growth factor receptors and is enhanced by fibronectin and laminin. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:1259-1276.