The relevance of politically relevant dyads in the study of interdependence and dyadic disputes

Conflict Management and Peace Science

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 113-133

  Benson, Michelle A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Interdependence; Politically relevant sample; Trade

Indexed keywords

EID: 29744435302     PISSN: 07388942     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07388940590948556     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barbieri, K. 1996, Economic interdependence: A path to peace or a source of interstate conflict. Journal of Peace Research 33(1): 29-49.
2. Barbieri, K. 2002. The liberal illusion. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3. Barbieri, K., and J. S. Levy. 1999. Sleeping with the enemy: The impact of war on trade. Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 463-479.
4. Barbieri, K., and J. S. Levy. 2003. The trade-disruption hypothesis and the liberal economic theory of peace. In Globalization and armed conflict, eds. G. Schneider, K. Barbieri, and N. P. Gleditisch (277-298). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
5. Barbieri, K., and G. Schneider. 1999. Globalization and peace: Assessing new directions in the study of trade and conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 387-404.
6. Bearce, D. H., and E. Fisher. 2002. Economic geography, trade, and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(3): 365-393.
7. Beck, N. 2003. Modeling dynamics in the study of conflict: A comment on Oneal and Russett. In Globalization and armed conflict, eds. G. Schneider, K. Barbieri, and N. P. Gleditisch (165-177). New York: Rowman and Littlefield,.
8. Beck, N., J. N. Katz, and R. Tucker. 1998. Beyond ordinary logit: Taking time seriously in binary time-series cross section analysis. American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260-1288.
9. Bennett, D. S., and A. Stam. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions 26: 179-204
10. Bliss, H., and B. Russett. 1998. Democratic trading partners: The liberal connection. Journal of Politics 60(4): 1126-1147.
11. Bremer, S. A. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 309-341.
12. Bueno de Mesquita, B. 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Bueno de Mesquita, B., and D. Lalman 1992. War and reason: Domestic and international imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Dixon, W. J. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review 88(1): 14-32.
15. Dixon, W. J., and B. E. Moon. 1993. Political similarity and American foreign trade patterns. Political Research Quarterly 46(1): 5-25.
16. Ethier, W., and A. Ray. 1979. Gains from trade and the size of a country. Journal of International Economics 9: 127-129
17. Feng, Y. 1994. Trade, conflict and alliances. Defense and Peace Economics 5: 301-313.
18. Feng, Y. 2000. Measuring international conflict: Developing cross-country time-series data. International Interactions 26(3): 287-319.
19. Gasiorowski, M. J. 1986. Economic interdependence and international conflict: Some cross-national evidence. International Studies Quarterly 30: 39-57.
20. Gasiorowski, M. J., and S. W. Polachek. 1982. Conflict interdependence: East-West trade and linkages in the era of détente. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26(4): 709-729.
21. Geller, D. S. 1993. Power differentials and war in rival dyads. International Studies Quarterly 37(2): 173-194.
22. Gelpi, C., and J. M. Grieco. 2003. Economic interdependence, the democratic state, and the liberal peace. In Economic interdependence and international conflict: New perspectives on an enduring debate, eds. E. D. Mansfield and B. M. Pollins (44-59). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23. Gleditsch, K. S. 2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(5): 712-724.
24. Gowa, J. 1989. Bipolarity, multipolarity, and free trade. American Political Science Review 83:1245-1256.
25. Gowa, J. 1994. Allies, adversaries, and international trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Gowa, J., and E. D. Mansfield. 1993. Power politics and international trade. American Political Science Review 87: 408-420.
27. Gurr, T. R., K. Jaggers, and W. H. Moore. 1989. Polity II codebook. Boulder: University of Colorado.
28. Head, A. C. 1995. Country size, aggregate fluctuations, and international risk sharing. Canadian Journal of Economics 28: 1096-1119.
29. Hegre, H. 2001. Trade, size asymmetry, and militarized conflict. Presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 30-September 2.
30. Hegre, H. 2003. Development and the liberal peace: What does it take to be a trading state? In Globalization and armed conflict, eds. G. Schneider, K. Barbieri, and N. P. Gleditisch (205-231). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
31. Jaggers, K., and T. R. Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32(4): 469-482.
32. Jaggers, K., and T. R. Gurr. 1996. POLITY III: Regime change and political authority, 1800-1994. (ICPSR Study #6695) Boulder, CO: Keith Jaggers/College Park, MD: Ted Robert Gurr [producers], 1995. Ann, Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
33. Kugler, J., and D. Lemke. 1996. Parity and war. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
34. Lemke, D., and W. Reed. 2001. The relevance of politically relevant dyads. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(1): 126-144.
35. Li, Q., and D. Sacko. 2002. The (Ir) Relevance of militarized interstate disputes for international trade. International Studies Quarterly 46:11-43.
36. Mansfield, E. D., H. Milner, and B. P. Rosendorff. 2000. Free to trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. American Political Science Review 94(2): 305-322.
37. Mansfield, E. D., and J. C. Pevehouse. 2000. Trade blocs, trade flows, and international conflict. International Organization 54(4): 775-808.
38. Mansfield, E. D., and B. M. Pollins. 2001. The study of interdependence and conflict. J. of Conflict Resolution 45(6) 834-859.
39. Maoz, Z., and N. Abdolali. 1989. Regime types and international conflict, 1817-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution 33: 3-35.
40. Maoz, Z., and B. Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87(3): 624-638.
41. Morrow, J. D. 1999. How could trade affect conflict? Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 481-489.
42. Morrow, J. D., R. M. Siverson, and T. E. Tabares. 1998. The political determinants of international trade: The major powers, 1907-1990. American Political Science Review 92(3): 649-661.
43. Morrow, J. D., R. M. Siverson, and T. E. Tabares. 1999. Correction to "The political determinants of international trade." American Political Science Review 93(4): 931-933.
44. Most, B. A., and H. Starr. 1989. Inquiry, logic, and international politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
45. Oneal, J. R., F. Oneal, Z. Maoz, and B. Russett. 1996. The liberal peace: Interdependence and conflict, 1950-1985. Journal of Peace Research 33(1): 11-38.
46. Oneal, J. R., and J. L. Ray. 1997. New tests of the democratic peace: Controlling for economic interdependence, 1950-1985. Political Research Quarterly 50(4): 751-775.
47. Oneal, J. R., and B. M. Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 41: 267-294.
48. Oneal, J. R., and B. M. Russett. 1999. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 423-442.
49. Oneal, J. R., and B. Russett. 2003. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. In Globalization and armed conflict, eds. G. Schneider, K. Barbieri, and N. P. Gleditisch (143-163). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
50. Organski, A. F. K., and J. Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Polachek, S. W. 1980. Conflict and trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(1): 57-78.
52. Polachek, S. W. 1997. Why do democracies cooperate more and fight less: The relationship between international trade and cooperation. Review of International Economics 5(3): 295-309.
53. Polachek, S. W. 1992. Conflict and trade: An economic approach to political international interactions. In Economics of arms reduction and the peace process, eds. W. Isard and C. H. Andersen (89-120). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
54. Polachek, S. W., and J. McDonald. 1992. Strategic trade and the incentive for cooperation. In Disarmament, economic conversion, and peace management, eds. M. Chatterji and L. R. Forcey. New York: Praeger.
55. Polachek, S. W., J. Robst, and Y.-C. Chang. 1999. Liberalism and interdependence: Extending the trade-conflict model. Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 405-422.
56. Pollins, B. M. 1989a. Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: The effect of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows. American Journal of Political Science 33(3): 737-761.
57. Pollins, B. M., 1989b. Does trade still follow the flag? American Political Science Review 83(2): 465-480.
58. Ray, J. L. 1995. Democracy and international politics: An evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
59. Reed, W. 2003. Information and economic interdependence. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 47(1): 54-71.
60. Rengerr, N. J., comp., with John Campbell. 1995. Treaties and alliances of the world. 6th ed. New York: Stockton.
61. Reuveny, R. 1999a. The political economy of Israeli-Palestinian interdependence. Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 643-664.
62. Reuveny, R. 1999b. Israeli-Palestinian economic interdependence reconsidered. Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 668-671.
63. Rosencrance, R. 1986. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.
64. Russett, B., and J. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace. New York: Norton.
65. Sabrosky, A. 1980. Interstate alliances: Their reliability and the expansion of war. In The correlates of war II, ed. J. D. Singer (161-198). New York: Free Press.
66. Schneider, G., K. Barbieri, and N. P. Gleditsch, 2003. Does globalization contribute to peace? A critical survey of the literature. In Globalization and armed conflict, eds. G. Schneider, K. Barbieri, and N. P. Gleditisch (3-29). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
67. Siverson, R., and J. King. 1980. Attributes of alliance membership and war participation, 1815-1965. American Journal of Political Science 24: 1-15.
68. Siverson, R., and H. Starr. 1991. The diffusion of war. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
69. Starr, H., and B. A. Most. 1976. The substance and study of borders in international relations research. International Studies Quarterly 20: 581-620.