Assesment of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Comparison with coronary angiography;Estudio de perfusión miocárdica por cardiorresonancia magnética: Comparación con la angiografía coronaria

Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 388-395

  Pons Lladó, Guillem ^a   Carreras, Francesc ^a   Leta, Rubén ^a   Pujadas, Sandra ^a   García Picart, Juan ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE LA SANTA CREU I SANT PAU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contrast media; Coronary angiography; Coronary disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOLINIUM; GADOTERIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 2942746450     PISSN: 03008932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13061116     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Christensen BV, Stillman AE, et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 1997;204:373-84.
2. Sandstede JJW, Lipke C, Beer M, Harre K, Pabst T, Kenn W, et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardiurn on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1737-40.
3. Cullen JHS, Horsfield MA, Reek CR, Cherryman GR, Barnett DB, Samani NJ. A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1386-94.
4. Lauerma K, Virtanen KS, Sipilä LM, Hekali P, Aronen HJ. Multislice MRI in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease before and after revascularization. Circulation 1997; 96:2859-67.
5. Keijer JT, Van Rossum AC, Van Eenige MJ, Bax JJ, Visser FC, Teule JJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of regional myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: quantitative comparison with 201Thallium-SPECT and coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:607-15.
6. Plein S, Ridgway JP, Jones TR, Bloomer TN, Sivananthan M. Coronary artery disease: assessment with a comprehensive MR imaging protocol: initial results. Radiology 2002;225:300-7.
7. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, Okinaka T, Isaka N, Nakano T, et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast: enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantiative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003;229:209-16.
8. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42.
9. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Klein C, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101:1379-83.
10. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Büchi M, Knüsel PR, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance. A comparison with positron emission tomography and, coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-5.
11. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnakenburg B, Wegscheider K, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108:432-7.
12. Sensky PR, Samani NJ, Reek C, Cherryman GR. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a qualitative approach. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:373-83.
13. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N. MR first pass imaging: quantitative assessment of transmural perfusion and collateral flow. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1997;13:205-18.
14. Bache RJ, Schwartz JS. Effect of perfusion pressure distal to a coronary stenosis on transmural myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1982;65:928-35.
15. Sandstede JJW, Lipke C, Beer M, Harre K, Pabst T, Kenn W, et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging. Use in the prediction of myocardial viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1737-40.
16. Kramer CM, Rogers WJ, Mankad S, Theobald TM, Pakstis DL, Hu YL. Contractile reserve and contrast uptake pattern by magnetic resonance imaging and functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1835-40.
17. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1782-8.
18. Wilson R, Marcus M, White C. Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. Circulation 1987;75:723-32.
19. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM, Kim RJ, Harris KR, Hedjbeli S, et al. Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 2001;104:2412-6.
20. Candell-Riera J, Martín-Comín J, Escaned J, Peteiro J. Valoración fisiológica de la circulación coronaria. Papel de las técnicas invasivas y no invasivas. Rev Esp Cardiol 2002;55:271-91.
21. Forder JR, Pohost GM. Cardiovascular nuclear magnetic resonance: basic and clinical applications. J Clin Invest 2003;111:1630-9.