The feasibility of using pattern recognition software to measure the influence of computer use on the consultation

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 3, Issue , 2003, Pages 1-10

  De Lusignan, Simon ^a   Wilson, Eben ^b   Dyble, Andy ^b   Grant, Tristan ^b   Theadom, Alice ^a   Chan, Tom ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Main Communications   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CAMERA; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GESTURE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SIMULATION;

EID: 2942744788     PISSN: 14726947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Burns F: Information for health, an information strategy for a modern NHS, 1998-2000. A National Strategy for Local Implementation London: NHS Executive Leeds.
2. Sullivan F, Mitchell E: Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ 1995, 311:848-852.
3. NHS Confederation: GMS Contract Negotiations [http://www.nhsconfed.webhoster.co.uk/gmscontract/].
4. de Lusignan S, Wells SE, Russell C, Bevington WP, Arrowsmith P: Development of an assessment tool to measure the influence of clinical software on the delivery of high quality consultations. A study comparing two computerized medical record systems in a nurse run heart clinic in a general practice setting. Med Inform Internet Med 2002, 27(4):267-80.
5. de Lusignan S, Wells S, Russell C: A model for nurse consultation in the secondary prevention of coronary Heart Disease. British Nursing Journal 2003, 12(2):85-90.
6. Theadom A, de Lusignan S, Wilson E, Chan T: Using three-channel video to evaluate the impact of the use of the computer on the patient-centredness of the general practice consultation. In press, Journal of Informatics in Primary Care.
7. Hertzmark GA, Brownbridge G, Fitter M, Evans A: Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. Journal RCGP 1984, 34:649-654.
8. Warshawsky S: General practitioner records on computer. Fam Pract 1993, 10(4):474.
9. Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C: Does awareness of being video recorded affect doctors' consultation behaviour? Br J Gen Prac 1990, 40:455-8.
10. Fitter MJ, Cruikshank PJ: The computer in the consulting room: a psychological framework. Behaviour and Information Technology 1983, 1:81-92.
11. Booth N, Kohanneyad, Robinson P: Information in the consulting room (iiCR) Final Project Report. 2002 [http://www.schin.ncl.ac.uk/iiCR/final_report.asp].
12. Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J, Cohen N, Sharon A, Binztok M, Margolis CZ: Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994, 43(3-4):269-73.
13. Ridsdale L, Hudd S: What do patients want and not want to see about themselves on the computer screen: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997, 15(4):180-3.
14. Ridsdale L, Hudd S: Computers in the consultation: the patient's view. Br J Gen Pract 1994, 44(385):367-9.
15. Salmon P: The Psychology of Health and Medicine, A Guide for Psychologists, Doctors, Nurses and Counsellors. Wiley Press 2000.
16. Ong LML, De Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB: Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995, 40(7):903-918.
17. Heintzman M, Leathers DG, Parrott RL, Cairns AB: Non-verbal rapport building behaviours effect on perceptions of a supervisor. Man Comm Quar 1993, 7(2):181-208.
18. Campbell LM, Sullivan FM, Murray TS: Video recording of general practitioner consultations - the effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1995, 311:326-7.
19. Coleman T: Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Fam Prac 2000, 17(5):422-427.
20. National Office for Summative Assessment: The COGPED video. [http://www.nosa.org.uk/information/video/cogped/guidelines.htm].
21. Birgitte A: The desk top computer as a magic box:patterns of behaviour connected with the desk top computers. GPs and- patients' perceptions. Fam Pract 1997, 14:17-23.
22. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD, Benson J, Draper J: The Enhanced Cambridge-Calgary guide. [http://www.skillscascade.com/handouts/ENHANCEDCalgarycambridge.pdf].
23. Wellclose Square Surgery: Using the computer in the consulting room. [http://www.wellclosesquare.co.uk/training/iicr/cdrom.htm].
24. University of Newcastle, Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics: Using the computer in the consulting room. [http://www.prodigy.nhs.uk/Training/UCCR.asp].
25. Mitchell E, Sullivan F: A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ 2001, 322(7281):279-82.
26. Roter D: The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis. 2002 [http://www.rias.org/manual.html].
27. Caris-Verhallen WMCM, de Gruijter IM, Kerkstra A, Bensing JM: Factors related to nurse communication with elderly people. J Adv Nurs 1999, 30(5):1106-1117.
28. Ed, Lew MS: Principles of Visual Information Retrieval (Advances in Pattern Recognition.). London, Springer-Verlag 2001.
29. Chang R, Guan L, Burne JA: An automated form of video image analysis applied to classification of movement disorders. Disabil Rehabil 22(1-2):97-108. 2000 Jan 10-20
30. Holzreiter S, Kastner J, Wagner P: Motion measurement with high-speed video. J Biomed Eng 1993, 15(2):140-2.
31. MySQL AB [http://www.mysql.com]
32. Main Communications. Cats eye networks [http://www.mainhighway.com/catseye/index.htm]
33. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm]
34. McKinley RK, Fraser RC, Baker R: A model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation of clinicians. BMJ 2001, 322:712-715.