What do patients want and not want to see about themselves on the computer screen: A qualitative study

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 180-183

  Ridsdale, Leone ^a   Hudd, Sheila ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computerized; Family practice; Medical records systems; Patient satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EID: 0030667164     PISSN: 02813432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02813439709035024     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Spencer-Jones J. Telling the right patient. BMJ 1981;283:291-2.
2. Medical Ethics' Committee of the British Medical Association. Guidelines for doctors on the access to Health Records Acts 1990. London: BMA, 1991.
3. Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: the patient's view. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44:367-9.
4. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage, 1990.
5. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
6. Britten N, Bartholomew J, Morris R, Zander L. Consultants' and patients' views about patient access to their general practice records. J R Soc Med 1991;84:284-7.
7. Birtchell J. Is there a scientifically acceptable alternative to the epidemiological study of familial factors in mental illness? Soc Sci Med 1974;8:335-50.
8. Jenkins R, Smeeton N, Marinker M. A study of the classification of mental illness in general practice. Psychol Med 1985;15:403-9.
9. Blaxter M. The causes of illness - women talking. Soc Sci Med 1983;17:59-69.
10. Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P. How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction? Fam Pract 1995;12:32-6.
11. Liaw ST. Information management in primary medical care in South Australia. Fam Pract 1994;11:44-50.