Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 99-103

  Aranha, Ana Ceclia Corrêa ^a   Freire Pimenta, Luiz André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE; TETRIC CERAM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 2942735093     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 173-185.
2. Bryant, R.W. Direct composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. New Zealand Dent Journal 1991; 87: 39-42.
3. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994;24: 781-785.
4. Ferdinakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:221-229.
5. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: Areview. J Dent 1976;4:199-206.
6. Going, RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: A summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972; 84: 1349-1357.
7. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
8. Triadan H. When is microleakage a real clinical problem? Oper Dent 1987; 2:153-157.
9. Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized composite resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V composite resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:253-258.
10. Freedman G. "Packable" composites: The new paradigm in amalgam alternatives, Dent Today 1998; 17: 71-72.
11. Christensen GJ. Overcoming challenges with composite resin in class II situation. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 1579-1580
12. Leinfelder KF. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 1998, 17: 112-116.
13. Leinfelder KF. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Educ Contin 1998; 19: 37-41.
14. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift ES Jr. "Packable" composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 234-249.
15. Erdileck N, Ozata F; Sepetciouglu F. Microleakage of glass-ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer composite resin cement. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1994; 21: 781-785.
16. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Am J Dent 1998; 12: 123-130.
17. Pimenta LAF. Microleakage evaluation of Class II preparations with composites with two different insertion techniques. Postdoctorate thesis, Dental School of Piracicaba- UNICAMP, Brazil, 1999.
18. Affleck MS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA, Setien VJ. Microleakage with incremental versus bulk placement utilizing "packable" composite. J Dent Res 1999;78:155 (Abstr 393).
19. Campanela LC, Meiers JC. Microleakage of composites and compomers in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 185-189.
20. Chistensen GJ. Sorting out the confusing array of composite resin-based composites in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 275-277.
21. Coli P, Brannstrom, M. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in Class II composite resin restorations applied in bulk or in two increments. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:583-590.
22. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: the material and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 663-676.
23. Leinfelder KF, Broome JC. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of anew universal composite resin. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 177-183.
24. Yap AU, Pearson GJ, Billington RW, Stokes AN. An in vitro microleakage study of three restorative techniques for Class II restorations in posterior teeth. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 2031-2035.
25. Bowen RL, Rapson JE, Dickson G. Hardening shinkage and hygroscopic expansion of composite resin. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 654-658.
26. Davidson CL, Degee AJ, Feltzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contration stress. J Dent Res 1994; 67: 1396-1399.
27. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 777-783.
28. Neiva IF, de Andrada MA, Baratieri LN, Monteriro Junior S, Ritter AV. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 282-289.
29. Crim GA. Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of a dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 21-24.
30. Eackle WS, Ito RK. Effect of insertion technique on microleakage in mesio-occlusodistal composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 369-374.
31. Pucket AD, Smith RS. Method to measure the polymerization shrinkage of light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 56-57.
32. Miranda Jr WG, Nunes MF, Cardoso PEC, Santos JFF. Microleakage of "packable" composite resin combines with a flowable composite. J Dent Res 1999, 78: 306 (Abstr 1603).
33. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin bondind agents. Am J Dent 2001, 14: 132-136.
34. Pimenta LAF, Paiva OC. Efficacy of hydrophilic dentin bonding in the control of marginal microleakage. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent- Brazil, 1997; 51: 183-187.
35. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr AL. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 31-33.
36. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore Bk, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 302-307.
37. Tung FF, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: An in vitro investigation. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 430-434.