Illusory conjunctions of musical pitch and timbre

Acoustic Research Letters Online

Volumn 4, Issue , 2003, Pages 65-70

  Hall, Michael D ^a   Wieberg, Kimberly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY FEATURE INTEGRATION; ILLUSORY CONJUNCTIONS; MUSICAL PITCH;

AUDITION; DATA ACQUISITION; MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PROBABILITY; PROBES;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 2942718901     PISSN: 15297853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.1578951     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. A. Treisman and H. Schmidt, "Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects," Cog. Psy., 14, 107-141 (1982).
2. W. Prinzmetal, R.B. Ivry, D. Beck, and N. Shimizu, "A measurement theory of illusory conjunctions.," J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept, and Perf, 28(2), 251-269 (2002).
3. M.D. Hall, R.E. Pastore, B.E. Acker, and W. Huang, "Evidence for auditory feature integration with spatially distributed items," Perception & Psychophysics, 62(6), 1243-1257 (2000).
4. W.F. Thompson, M.D. Hall, and J. Pressing, "Illusory conjunctions of pitch and duration in unfamiliar tone sequences," J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept, and Perf., 27(1), 128-140 (2001).
5. F.G. Ashby, W. Prinzmetal, R. Ivry, and W.T. Maddox, "A formal theory of feature binding in object perception," Psy. Review, 103(1), 165-192 (1996).
6. R.E. Pastore, M.A. Schmuckler, L. Rosenblum, and R. Szczesiul, "Duplex perception with musical stimuli," Perception & Psychophysics 33, 469-474 (1983).
7. W.H. Batchelder and Riefer, D.M., "Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling," Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 57-66 (1999).
8. X. Hu, "Multinomial processing tree models: An implementation," Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 31 (4), 689-695 (1999).
9. Random binding model, Auditory Lab (M. Hall, 2002), http://www.scsv. nevada.edu/~audlab/rbmodel.pdf
10. C.S. Dodson, W. Prinzmetal, and A. Shimaraura, "Using Excel to estimate parameters from observed data: An example from source memory data," Beh. Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 30, 517-526 (1998).
11. J.T. Townshend and F.G. Ashby, "Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition," J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept and Perf. 8, 834-864 (1982).
12. J.M. Grey. "Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres," J. of Acoust. Soc. of Am. 61(5), 1270-1277 (1977).
13. M.D. Hall. "Auditory feature integration in music and speech stimuli" [Abstract], Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society Meeting, 6, 106 (2001).
14. R.D. Melara and L.E. Marks. "Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness," Perception & Psychophysics 48(2), 169-178 (1990).
15. M. Pitt, "Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners," J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept, and Perf. 20, 876-986 (1994).
16. P. Iverson and C.L. Krumhansl, "Isolating the dynamical attributes of musical timbre," J. of Acoust. Soc. of Am. 94(5), 2595-2603 (1992).
17. W. Prinzmetal, J. Diedrichsen, and R.B. Ivry, "Illusory conjunctions are alive and well: A reply to Donk (1999)," J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept and Perf., 27(3), 538-541 (2001).
18. J.E.Cutting, "Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: Inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening," Psy. Review 83, 114-140 (1976).
19. D.M. Green, "Audition: Psychophysics and perception," In R.C. Atkinson, R.J. Herrinstein, G. Lindzey, and R.D. Luce(Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 327-376). New York: Wiley (1988).
20. M. Kubovy, "Should we resist the seductiveness of the space:time::vision:audition analogy?," J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept. & Perf. 14(2), 318-32 (1988).
21. M. Donk, "Illusory conjunctions die hard: A reply to Prinzmetal, Diedrichsen, and Irvy (2001)." J. of Exp. Psy.: Human Percept, and Perf., 27(3), 542-546 (2001).