Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 221-229

  Charasse, Basile ^a   Thai Van, Hung ^a,b   Chanal, Jean Marc ^a   Berger Vachon, Christian ^a,b   Collet, Lionel ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Amplitude growth function; Artificial neural network; Auditory nerve; Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Neural response telemetry (NRT); Pattern recognition; Threshold estimation

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; CORRELATION METHODS; ERROR ANALYSIS; NEUROLOGY; TELEMEDICINE;

AUDITORY NERVES; DEAF PATIENTS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUTOMATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ERROR; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS; TELEMETRY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PHYSICIANS; TELEMETRY;

EID: 2942713534     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., Shallop J.K., Firszt J.B., Hughes M.L., Hong S.H., et al. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear. 20(1):1999;45-59
2. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B.J. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am. J. Otol. 19(3):1998;320-327
3. Dillier N, Lai WK. Neural Response Telemetry (version 2.01). Swirtzerland: Zurick; 1998.
4. Lai W.K., Dillier N. A simple two-component model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea. Audiol. Neurootol. 5(6):2000;333-3345
5. Cullington H. Preliminary neural response telemetry results. Br. J. Audiol. 34(3):2000;131-140
6. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A., Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear. Hear. 21(2):2000;151-163
7. Franck K.H., Norton S.J. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear. Hear. 22(4):2001;289-299
8. Gordon K.A., Ebinger K.A., Gilden J.E., Shapiro W.H. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 189:2002;42-48
9. Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A.A., Gervais J.P. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear. Hear. 21(2):2000;164-174
10. Mason S.M., Cope Y., Garnham J., O'Donoghue G.M., Gibbin K.P. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant. Br. J. Audiol. 35(4):2001;225-235
11. Thai-Van H, Chanal JM, Coudert C, Veuillet E, Truy E, Collet L. Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001;58(2):153-62.
12. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88(5):1990;2205-2210
13. Charasse, Chanal, Berger-Vachon, Collet. Influence of stimulus frequency on NRT recordings. Int J Audiol 2004;in press.
14. Budde T., Haude M., Hopp H.W., Kerber S., Caspari G., Fassbender G., et al. A prognostic computer model to individually predict post-procedural complications in interventional cardiology: the INTERVENT Project. Eur. Heart J. 20:1999;354-363
15. Tharpe A.M., Biswas G., Hall J.W. 3rd Development of an expert system for pediatric auditory brainstem response interpretation. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 4:1993;163-171
16. Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995. p. 95-103 (adaline and perceptron), p. 140-8 (backprop).
17. Holst H., Ohlsson M., Peterson C., Edenbrandt L. A confident decision support system for interpreting electrocardiograms. Clin. Physiol. 19(5):1999;410-418
18. Lim C.P., Harrison R.F., Kennedy R.L. Application of autonomous neural network systems to medical pattern classification tasks. Artif. Intell. Med. 11(3):1997;215-239
19. Rojas R. Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996. p. 84-91 (perceptron learning), p. 159-62 (backprop).
20. Tian J., Juhola M., Gronfors T. Latency estimation of auditory brainstem response by neural networks. Artif. Intell. Med. 10(2):1997;115-128
21. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88(3):1990;1385-1391
22. Dillier N., Lai W.K., Almqvist B., Frohne C., Muller-Deile J., Stecker M., et al. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111(5 Part 1):2002;407-414
23. Riedmiller M, Braun H. A direct adaptative method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. In: Proccedings of the IEEE international Conference on Neural Networks; 1993.
24. Vannier E., Adam O., Motsch J.F. Objective detection of brainstem auditory evoked potentials with a priori information from higher presentation levels. Artif. Intell. Med. 25(3):2002;283-301