Statistical interpretation of key comparison reference value and degrees of equivalence

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 439-446

  Kacker, R N ^a   Datla, R U ^a   Parr, A C ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interlaboratory evaluation; Measurement uncertainty; Variance components

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; MEASUREMENTS; STATISTICAL METHODS; UNITS OF MEASUREMENT; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

INTERLABORATORY EVALUATION; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINITY; RANDOM LABORATORY-EFFECTS; SYSTEMATIC LABORATORY-EFFECTS; VARIANCE COMPONENTS;

UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

EID: 2942696380     PISSN: 1044677X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6028/jres.108.038     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes. International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM). 14 October 1999, (http://wwwl.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/mra_2003.pdf).
2. Guidelines for CIPM key comparisons, International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM), 1 March 1999, (http://www1.bipm.org/utils/en/pdf/guidelines.pdf).
3. L. Nielsen, Evaluation of measurement intercomparisons by the method of least squares, Report DFM-99-R39, 3208 LN, Danish Institute of Fundamental Metrology, Lyngby, Denmark (2000).
4. R. N. Kacker and A. T. Jones, On use of Bayesian statistics to make the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement consistent, Metrologia 40, 235-248 (2003).
5. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 2nd Ed., Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, ISBN 92-67-10188-9 (1995).
6. R. N. Kacker, R. U. Datla, and A. C. Parr, Combined result and associated uncertainty from interlaboratory evaluations based on the ISO Guide, Metrologia 39, 279-293 (2002).
7. S. R. Searle, Linear Models, 1971, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
8. R. N. Kacker, Combining information from interlaboratory evaluations using a random effects model, Metrologia 41, 132-136 (2004).
9. R. C. Paule and J. Mandel, Consensus values and weighting factors, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand.(U.S.) 87, 377-385 (1982).
10. I. Lira and W. Wöger, Bayesian evaluation of the standard uncertainty and coverage probability in a simple measurement model, Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 1172-1179 (2001).
11. BIPM key comparison data base, (http://kcdb.bipm.org).