Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: Two cross sectional surveys

British Medical Journal

Volumn 328, Issue 7452, 2004, Pages 1350-1353

  Schroter, Sara ^a   Barratt, Helen ^a   Smith, Jane ^a  

^a BMJ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SAMPLE;

EID: 2942616765     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38117.624259.55     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Delamothe T, Müllner M, Smith R. Pleasing both authors and readers. BMJ 1999;318:888-9.
2. Müllner M, Groves T. Making research papers in the BMJ more accessible. BMJ 2002;325:456.
3. Müllner M. Publishing short articles in the print journal and full articles on the web? The BMJ is doing it with most research papers Eur J Sci Edit 2003;29:6-9.
4. Electronic responses. Pleasing both authors and readers. BMJ 1999 www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/318/7188/777#responses (accessed 21 Nov 2003).
5. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York: Wiley, 1978.
6. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002;324:1183.